 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] decreasing Xenmon overhead
| To: | "Ashish Gupta" <ashishgup@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Xen-users] decreasing Xenmon overhead |
| From: | "Diwaker Gupta" <diwaker.lists@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 29 May 2007 15:49:42 -0700 |
| Cc: | Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivery-date: | Tue, 29 May 2007 15:48:01 -0700 |
| Dkim-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=TXEiBrfmP8hgY0UlPXIWa2Q1f6Gqq0fIsc5Ev2Abjd96+0U22lOBMspEcgX1vuknMV4in16N+F3uhjxoO8OW8XgJM4F7LEYa4sUsDfMUizy/nWHaRvme0wIRRPW0ho8BaKfIgcBQtEw8UA3beDR1h7aNhAiqIqwlVSsxdUgV3TQ= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=jNypbNfA0fv4nFJ1gmwSEH7uQDJZ6VYZKFMO38w/ZZHEZfZbB2sSBncSGVsQ5CZeyOY2Tn01nNofuJVfx8Ve+mSkSfIcRcf8+5kpIoYG6yq7rxmN3S+UlV54pl7K3w+HcgfEE8fqJBDohmAtgqvliE/IpXpXt9ClI6lRR2YfFN8= |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <fcc5876b0705291253u2b2cdccfk4880c3fec7fab25f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| References: | <fcc5876b0705291253u2b2cdccfk4880c3fec7fab25f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
Ashish, for offline analysis. However I notice that at an interval of 100 ms or so the overhead imposed by dom0 is quite high , with upto 40% of CPU utilization. Are you sure that the overhead is due to xenmon? What CPU utilization do you see in Domain 0 for the same workload, but without xenmon? Are there ways I can drastically reduce this overhead ? I read somwhere about event overhead, using event masks and python overhead, but am not really sure how to use this information to reduce the overhead. Exactly what metrics are you interested in monitoring? You might want to look at 'xentrace --help' and 'xentrace -e'. Basically you want the minimal set of events that will give you the desired information. To see available events, look at /usr/include/xen/trace.h HTH, Diwaker -- Web/Blog/Gallery: http://floatingsun.net/blog _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Xen-users] Live Migration with IPs?, Björn Metzdorf |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Xen-users] Xen 3.1 - cannot open device, Rob van Oostveen |
| Previous by Thread: | [Xen-users] decreasing Xenmon overhead, Ashish Gupta |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-users] decreasing Xenmon overhead, Ashish Gupta |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
