|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-users
RE: [Xen-users] 64-Bit Xen?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
> Donofrio, Lewis
> Sent: 15 May 2007 13:33
> To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [Xen-users] 64-Bit Xen?
>
> Question,
>
> If you have a 64-Bit host running Xen will the guest's be 64-bit as
> well?
Depends on several things. But first, lets just quickly recap the modes
that exist biggest to smallest:
64-bit - supports HUGE memory addresses (physical memory up to 40 bits
(1024 GB = 1TB), virtual memory to 48 bits (256 TB), with future
extension up to, I think, 53 bits if necessary).
32-bit PAE - supports 32-bit (4GB) virtual address, but up to 36 bits
(64GB) of physical memory [although Xen limits this to 34 bits/16GB].
32-bit non-PAE - 32-bit virtual, 32-bit physical address.
So now to what's supported:
HVM (Fully virtualized guest) can be anything up to the same as the
hypervisor, so a 64-bit hypervisor supports all of the above modes,
whilst a 32-bit PAE can't use 64-bit, and a 32-bit non-PAE can't do
anything but 32-bit non-PAE guests.
Para-virtual guest have traditionally had the requitement of being
identical to the hypervisor. With the upcomming release of 3.1.0 of Xen,
this will be reduced somewhat by allowing 32-bit PAE guests on top of
64-bit hypervisor. With this version, it's still not possible to run
32-bit non-PAE on a 64-bit hypervisor.
--
Mats
> ______________________________________________________________________
> Lewis Donofrio@xxxxxxxxx
> Cell: (734) 323-8776
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-users mailing list
> Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
|
|
|
|