WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] Windows domU on a no HVM CPU

To: "Gary W. Smith" <gary@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Windows domU on a no HVM CPU
From: Nico Kadel-Garcia <nkadel@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 10:03:18 +0100
Cc: Velten Spägele <xen@xxxxxxxxx>, xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 02:00:34 -0700
Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=XOIfugj0eUdChIo6vMIJ7WEOWbqGCqabA2Q9Xj7pxZALH1Hy66plWHTK2LMEbN/zvwyiiKHSib0mD5oE/B0zVMXdQ0TIAHNTQwwo4FysQhfuCzy2ElKFaLcJaQqPaPaKDywz9iVOdOL/BdeJQwRG8NgxmocT0kvJHWECrwaqm0w=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=BCHTP+pk750KQMePJ5MLTmNQcjU9agioUJ3APyZI0Vz0F4H7436AXlYZpFkqlOQQbXlzfzOdKTGZJIrnaKt6PEP9hqtqWQuvFHtZj6gcKkjvRYxBOIT8saOHT7po0vFn8Tk+4MARU8r33znC7yL2q88f5yr/bvXjNZ6QNCjwSjw=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <57F9959B46E0FA4D8BA88AEDFBE5829024F226@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <461FF944.1010202@xxxxxxxxx> <46200C29.9060800@xxxxxxxxx> <57F9959B46E0FA4D8BA88AEDFBE5829024F226@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221)
Gary W. Smith wrote:
There are a lot of legacy reasons for running Windows 2000.  We have run into 
custom grown apps that have relied on some os level stuff that didn't play well 
with 2003.  In this case we have run the with VMWare (as that was the only 
alternative at the time for us).

BTW, the OS will still be maintained through 2010 (according to M$).  Also, we 
have received support for NT as late as 2005 at the last company I worked for.

Really! I thought it fell off the primary support list several years ago and went to "extended", "we-ll fix it if you give us extra money" support. You can't get licenses from Microsoft for it anymore, according to their own website.

Where is your cite of the 2010 support date? I assume by that you mean the extended support?


_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users