| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] Re: xen bonding and network performance dropping to ~ 0.
...
> >
> > Are you aware of this issue?
> > http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=753
> >
> > May be your problem is related to this?
>
> Yes, I've seen this report, and while the vlan parts and the oops are
> not releavnt to my case, the explanation in
> http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=753#c12 seems
> to match, but the suggested solution is to apply two patches that have
> already been applied in kernels >= 2.6.17 and I see this on kernels
> 2.6.18 (RHEL5) and 2.6.20 (FC6).
I experience similar problem.
But I don't use interface bonding at all!
In my installation I use 8021Q.
(I use 2.6.18 also, but Debian, not FC. My Xen is 3.0.4, Debian
package)
Here is my problem:
If I don't use xenbr0 (fig.1)
all works fine.
eth0 .---- eth0 VLAN1 [192.168.1.1]
============================<----- eth0.2 VLAN2 [192.168.2.1]
(tagged) .____ eth0.3 VLAN3 [192.168.3.1]
Figure 1.
peth0 +------+ eth0 .---- eth0 VLAN1 [192.168.1.1]
============|xenbr0|========<----- eth0.2 VLAN2 [192.168.2.1]
(tagged) +------+ .____ eth0.3 VLAN3 [192.168.3.1]
Figure 2.
But when I add the bridge (using netowrk-bridge script)
from external network
I can see untagged interface (192.168.1.1) only.
If I add ARP entry with IP and MAC of external
host that I want to ping to this host's ARP-table,
arp -s 192.168.2.2 00:11:22:33:44:55
I can ping external host.
I have looked to interfaces peth0, xenbr0, eth0 and its
subinterface eth0.2 using tcpdump
and marked that ARP-requests can be seen on all of the interfaces,
but ARP replys are on peth0 and xenbr0 only.
I have faced the problem on the only one of my Xen installations.
On the rest all works fine.
The question to all:
Have anybody seen similar problem and what can you advice me?
Can anybody say, may described problem be related to network card
that I use?
In particular to 8021Q hardware acceleration or something like that?
Axel, I understand that the problem is not like yours,
but may be it helps you to get a clue.
> --
> Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-users mailing list
> Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
--
WBR, i.m.chubin
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
|
|
| |
|
Home