RE: Xen-Staging [WAS: Re: [Xen-devel] Fwd: Re: [Xen-users] Random swap of interfaces at domU startup]

["Petersson, Mats" <Mats.Petersson@xxxxxxx>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
> Daniele Palumbo
> Sent: 25 January 2007 15:49
> To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: Petersson, Mats
> Subject: Xen-Staging [WAS: Re: [Xen-devel] Fwd: Re: 
> [Xen-users] Random swap of interfaces at domU startup]
> 
> On Wednesday 24 January 2007 18:33, Petersson, Mats wrote:
> > The patch just turned up in the staging tree (which is 
> "before it's been
> > tested"), so I expect it to hit the "unstable" tomorrow.
> 
> just to know:
> is there, and how can i can access the "staging" tree?

There's a mailing list for the staging tree, but I don't believe there
is any way to actually get to the mercurial that it gives you info from.


I wouldn't suggest that anyone on this mailing list uses the staging
tree either - since the whole reason for it's existance is that the
xen-unstable archive gets a bit more stable (staging tree is what's used
to build from to perform some trivial testing to ensure that the
xen-unstable tree is actually not completely broken). If some people
start using the staging tree as a xen-unstable-unstable, I expect
there'd be even more confusion about which version of what things are
being used and by whom - unstable isn't exactly known to always work
DESPITE the extra testing. 

[I subscribe to the staging tree because part of my job is to follow the
development of Xen, and I get a day or so advance notice of things
"coming up", compared to following the Xen-Changelog mailing list].

I probably shouldn't even have mentioned this in the first place... ;-)

--
Mats



_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users