WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] BKM for memory management

To: xen-users <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] BKM for memory management
From: "Ulrich Windl" <ulrich.windl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 09:14:06 +0100
Delivery-date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 00:14:30 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <5461330FA59EDB46BE9AB8AAF2C431AD028B3F86@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: Universitaet Regensburg, Klinikum
Priority: normal
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On 12 Dec 2006 at 9:49, Chu, Sam wrote:

> # Shadow pagetable memory for the domain, in MB.
> 
> # Should be at least 2KB per MB of domain memory, plus a few MB per
> vcpu.
> 
> shadow_memory = 64
> 

I never cared about "shadow memory". Should I? Is there a reasonable default if 
absent from the configuration file?

Regards,
Ulrich


_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>