|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-users
[Xen-users] Question on Xen schedulers
All,
following the
announcements and recommendations since mid of this year 'credit' is now the
(only) recommended scheduler and the others ('bvt', 'sedf') are already removed
from the latest Xen 3.0 sources or will be removed in the
future.
Now, 'credit' is
designed for an optimum utilisation of a SMP system and may be really the best
scheduler for this purpose. But i think this is not the only useful scenario for
the usage of Xen; there maybe other scenarios with other demands, e.g. soft
real-time systems and/or single processor systems.
If i remember
correctly, one of the major advantages mentioned in the first announcements of
Xen 3.0 was the support of multiple schedulers (for different purposes). Could
give anyone the reasons why this approach is not longer valid and what is the
reason to kick out the already existing more 'real-time friendly' schedulers,
especially sedf ?
Thanks
Werner
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-users] Question on Xen schedulers,
Schmidt Werner <=
|
Previous by Date: |
[Xen-users] Re: XEN sound emulation locks device exclusively, Csillag, Kristof \(GE Healthcare, consultant\) |
Next by Date: |
[Xen-users] More on SLES10, XEN, and bonding, Ulrich Windl |
Previous by Thread: |
[Xen-users] Re: XEN sound emulation locks device exclusively, Csillag, Kristof \(GE Healthcare, consultant\) |
Next by Thread: |
Re: [Xen-users] Question on Xen schedulers, Ulrich Windl |
Indexes: |
[Date]
[Thread]
[Top]
[All Lists] |
|
|
|
|