Does anyone know if there is any work being done on this?
Is there anything I can do to help move it along?
I'm in exactly the same position.
I've got a Dell E1705 with same hardware config as Woody (Same as 9400,
just branded different)
RE: "Bugzilla bug 187929: b44 module is not compiled into kernel-xen0"
This bug hasn't been updated since April 2006 when the b44 module was
disabled in kernel config due to "unknown symbol
dma_get_cache_alignment"
I've had this laptop for several months now, hoping Xen development
would catch up to the new hardware. I'm running FC5 but can't use VT
extensions in the Centrino Duo to run the xen kernels.
I'll be updating the bug with my data, but I'm not holding my breath.
Apparently there are too few of us using this driver, or too few
reporting it.
--Cal Webster
On Fri, 2006-04-28 at 09:48, Woody wrote:
> I have a new laptop that I am trying to work with Xen 3.0.
>
> The network card is a Broadcom 4400 10/100BaseT.
>
> Normally loading the b44 module gives this:
>
> Apr 28 20:07:53 ipanema kernel: [4294683.185000] b44.c:v0.97 (Nov 30, 2005)
> Apr 28 20:07:53 ipanema kernel: [4294683.185000] ACPI: PCI Interrupt
> 0000:03:00.0[A] -> GSI 17 (level, low) -> IRQ 177
> Apr 28 20:07:53 ipanema kernel: [4294683.189000] eth0: Broadcom 4400
> 10/100BaseT Ethernet 00:14:22:f2:57:36
>
> (under an Ubuntu kernel - 2.6.15-21-686 #1 SMP PREEMPT)
> Works similarly under a vanilla 2.6.16.
>
> When running a Xen patched 2.6.16 (as per
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/XenVirtualMachine/XenOnUbuntuDapper) or on the Xen
> live CD, I get:
>
> Apr 27 00:28:31 ipanema kernel: [ 20.038669] b44.c:v0.97 (Nov 30, 2005)
> Apr 27 00:28:31 ipanema kernel: [ 20.038700] ACPI: PCI Interrupt
> 0000:03:00.0[A] -> GSI 17 (level, low) -> IRQ 17
> Apr 27 00:28:31 ipanema kernel: [ 20.038710] b44: No usable DMA
> configuration, aborting.
> Apr 27 00:28:31 ipanema kernel: [ 20.040248] ACPI: PCI interrupt for
> device 0000:03:00.0 disabled
> Apr 27 00:28:31 ipanema kernel: [ 20.040251] b44: probe of 0000:03:00.0
> failed with error -5
>
> Am I doing something wrong?
>
> The first difference here is that ACPI allocates IRQ 17 instead of IRQ
> 177. Hope that rings bells for somebody :-)
>
> This is the relevant output of lspci -vvvv while it's running under 2.6.16:
> 0000:03:00.0 Ethernet controller: Broadcom Corporation BCM4401-B0
> 100Base-TX (rev 02)
> Subsystem: Dell: Unknown device 01cd
> Control: I/O- Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop-
> ParErr- Stepping- SERR+ FastB2B-
> Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort-
> <TAbort-
> <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR-
> Latency: 64
> Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 177
> Region 0: Memory at dcbfe000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=8K]
> Capabilities: [40] Power Management version 2
> Flags: PMEClk- DSI- D1+ D2+ AuxCurrent=0mA
> PME(D0+,D1+,D2+,D3hot+,D3cold+)
> Status: D0 PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=2 PME-
>
> and the first two lines of lspci -nvvvv
>
> 0000:03:00.0 0200: 14e4:170c (rev 02)
> Subsystem: 1028:01cd
>
> Laptop is Dell 9400 Core Duo T2600 2Gb Ram , SATA 100Gb
>
> The ultimate aim is to use the Intel VT extensions to run unmodified OSes
> underneath, but that's not that useful without networking.
>
> Other hints of problems: noticable graphics corruption under framebuffer
> console while running xen kernel.
>
> cheers,
> Woody
>
> PS: side question, is it possible to present a DomU unmodified OS with
> full / exclusive access to the Video card. (PCI-X nVidia Go 7800),
> obviously giving no video to Dom0.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-users mailing list
> Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
Home