WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] hvm, handle_mmio: failed to get instruction length

To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] hvm, handle_mmio: failed to get instruction length
From: Tom Brown <tbrown@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 01:00:32 -0700 (PDT)
Delivery-date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 01:01:20 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Is there a problem booting 2.4 kernels compiled on Redhat 7 machines? 
After some sweat and cursing I've gotten a config where grub works 
reliably, and I can get a 2.6 kernel to boot before it spills its guts all 
over, but I can not get an old 2.4 kernel to boot ... I should dig out a 
2.2 kernel, as that actually would have a purpose, but I was under the 
belief (possibly/probably self delusion) that running linux kernels with 
HVM would be easy...

I've tried xen-3.0.2-2 and -unstable and now -testing... all with the same 
result. With unstable I did find a patch for can not find an E820 memory 
map... but I have not been able to find a fix for this one...

(XEN) Code bytes around(len=256) c01fc909:
(XEN) c01fc900:0f 0d 86 40 01 00 00 0f 6f 06 0f 6f 4e 08 0f 6f 
(XEN) c01fc910:56 10 0f 6f 5e 18 0f 7f 03 0f 7f 4b 08 0f 7f 53 
(XEN) c01fc920:10 0f 7f 5b 18 0f 6f 46 20 0f 6f 4e 28 0f 6f 56 
(XEN) c01fc930:30 0f 6f 5e 38 0f 7f 43 20 0f 7f 4b 28 0f 7f 53 
(XEN) c01fc940:30 0f 7f 5b 38 4f 83 c6 40 83 c3 40 83 ff 05 7f 
(XEN) c01fc950:af eb 45 0f 6f 06 0f 6f 4e 08 0f 6f 56 10 0f 6f 
(XEN) c01fc960:5e 18 0f 7f 03 0f 7f 4b 08 0f 7f 53 10 0f 7f 5b 
(XEN) c01fc970:18 0f 6f 46 20 0f 6f 4e 28 0f 6f 56 30 0f 6f 5e 
(XEN) c01fc980:38 0f 7f 43 20 0f 7f 4b 28 0f 7f 53 30 0f 7f 5b 
(XEN) c01fc990:38 4f 83 c6 40 83 c3 40 85 ff 7f b7 89 e8 83 e0 
(XEN) c01fc9a0:3f 89 c1 c1 e9 02 89 df f3 a5 a8 02 74 02 66 a5 
(XEN) c01fc9b0:a8 01 74 01 a4 0f 20 c0 83 c8 08 0f 22 c0 8b 04 
(XEN) c01fc9c0:24 5a 5b 5e 5f 5d c3 89 f6 8d bc 27 00 00 00 00 
(XEN) c01fc9d0:53 8b 5c 24 08 e8 d6 f6 f0 ff 0f ef c0 b8 3f 00 
(XEN) c01fc9e0:00 00 8d b4 26 00 00 00 00 8d bc 27 00 00 00 00 
(XEN) c01fc9f0:0f e7 03 0f e7 43 08 0f e7 43 10 0f e7 43 18 0f 
(XEN) handle_mmio: failed to get instruction length
(XEN) domain_crash_sync called from platform.c:846
(XEN) Domain 12 (vcpu#0) crashed on cpu#1:


any thoughts? AFAIK, there is nothing magic here. I can post configs if 
needed, but the dump seems like it is supposed to be sufficient. No, I 
have not compared all the hex dumps to see if they are consistent... hhmm, 
that probably is a good idea... yes, it looks quite repeatable.

-Tom

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>