|  |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
 
  |   |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
  
    |   xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] Re: Xen and TLS, -mno-tls-direct-seg-refs needed? 
| > However, there is a fix in the later models of Opteron/Athlon64 processors 
> that allows segments to be used. Intel, I think, hasn't got this feature 
> (yet?)... 
And 64-Bit VMWare doesn't run without it, and my Athlon64-CPU doesn't
have segmentation-support yet :-(
(And so i guess, Intel CPUs have that feature)
> So for backwards compatibility reasons and such, the 64-bit version of Xen 
> uses a different method for protecting itself from being overwritten, and 
> therfore negative segment references work fine. 
I see. Thanks for the clarification.
  signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
 _______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users | 
 
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |  | 
Re: [Xen-users] Xen and TLS, -mno-tls-direct-seg-refs needed?, Javier Guerra[Xen-users] Xen and TLS, -mno-tls-direct-seg-refs needed?, Sven Köhler
[Xen-users] Re: Xen and TLS, -mno-tls-direct-seg-refs needed?, Matthew Palmer
[Xen-users] Re: Xen and TLS, -mno-tls-direct-seg-refs needed?, Molle Bestefich
[Xen-users] Re: Xen and TLS, -mno-tls-direct-seg-refs needed?, Sven Köhler
[Xen-users] Re: Xen and TLS, -mno-tls-direct-seg-refs needed?, Molle Bestefich
[Xen-users] Re: Xen and TLS, -mno-tls-direct-seg-refs needed?, Sven Köhler
[Xen-users] Re: Xen and TLS, -mno-tls-direct-seg-refs needed?, Molle Bestefich
RE: [Xen-users] Re: Xen and TLS, -mno-tls-direct-seg-refs needed?, Petersson, Mats
Re: [Xen-users] Re: Xen and TLS, -mno-tls-direct-seg-refs needed?,
Sven Köhler <=
Re: [Xen-users] Re: Xen and TLS, -mno-tls-direct-seg-refs needed?, Stefan Kaltenbrunner
 |  |  | 
  
    |  |  |