|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-users
[Xen-users] Xen and TLS, -mno-tls-direct-seg-refs needed?
Hi,
The Gentoo-Wiki about Xen suggests, to add "-mno-tls-direct-seg-refs" to
CFLAGS and to recompile the whole system. So it seems, NPTL will work
without problems (and without performance drawback) after that.
Sweet!
But i carefully read http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/XenSpecificGlibc,
and it says:
"On 32-bit x86 platforms, Xen uses segmentation to provide protection of
the memory used for the hypervisor. This results in some performance
issues since wrap-around segments as used by glibc need expensive extra
handling. For more information on how Xen uses segmentation, see
XenSegments."
On 32-bit platforms?
Does it mean, that i don't need to use that "-mno-tls-direct-seg-refs"
on 64-Bit platforms?
That's actually all i'm concerned about.
Thanks,
Sven
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-users] Xen and TLS, -mno-tls-direct-seg-refs needed?,
Sven Köhler <=
- [Xen-users] Re: Xen and TLS, -mno-tls-direct-seg-refs needed?, Matthew Palmer
- [Xen-users] Re: Xen and TLS, -mno-tls-direct-seg-refs needed?, Molle Bestefich
- [Xen-users] Re: Xen and TLS, -mno-tls-direct-seg-refs needed?, Sven Köhler
- [Xen-users] Re: Xen and TLS, -mno-tls-direct-seg-refs needed?, Molle Bestefich
- [Xen-users] Re: Xen and TLS, -mno-tls-direct-seg-refs needed?, Sven Köhler
- [Xen-users] Re: Xen and TLS, -mno-tls-direct-seg-refs needed?, Molle Bestefich
- RE: [Xen-users] Re: Xen and TLS, -mno-tls-direct-seg-refs needed?, Petersson, Mats
- Re: [Xen-users] Re: Xen and TLS, -mno-tls-direct-seg-refs needed?, Sven Köhler
- Re: [Xen-users] Re: Xen and TLS, -mno-tls-direct-seg-refs needed?, Stefan Kaltenbrunner
Re: [Xen-users] Xen and TLS, -mno-tls-direct-seg-refs needed?, Javier Guerra
|
|
|
|
|