WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] Xen in a 32 way system

To: "Pablo Montesinos" <pablomontesinos@xxxxxxxxx>, xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Xen in a 32 way system
From: "Jeff Lane" <sundowner225@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 13:18:21 -0400
Delivery-date: Wed, 31 May 2006 10:19:01 -0700
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=mbTtxMhV8ZD+gnCYw2GYMCdkparYubM2S7MBxcIkrYKO6kbnmrkqdyL2roHDaHMaNWDcVnjMnbTF0VcvTvgkww8EH4o6jTR9ZRExXhLn7oBhYJeUWBvJLxuvY1gaPUfNnvS+63EiLSEQ1QM90OhWD9b8h9YWvRC2RiZIAbhnGXc=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <2e3e87640605310907g7f6270fh9f08d88a8c9e5383@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <EF8D308BE33AF54D8934DF26520252D304967543@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <2e3e87640605310907g7f6270fh9f08d88a8c9e5383@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On 5/31/06, Pablo Montesinos <pablomontesinos@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Yeah, it's an IBM machine, 32 way, xeon x86_64, 64GB of ram.
DomO: redhat enterprise linux
DomU: Fedora core 5

Thanks,
Pablo


Regarding the Skew, I agree that it is harmless...  I have seen that
on several x460 permutations as well, and it does not seem to affect
anything.

However, have you tried passing something like apic=bigsmp (works on
SLES on a similar configuration)???

I know this is FC and not SLES or SuSE, or RHEL for that matter, but
to me, this sounds a lot like the Xen kernel being used with FC5 is
not enabling bigsmp by default...  I saw the same thing elsewhere and
passing apic=bigsmp seems to fix the problem for me...  so your milage
may vary...

Jeff

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>