 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-users
[Xen-users] vif showing up as eth1 (no eth0)
| To: | xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [Xen-users] vif showing up as eth1 (no eth0) |
| From: | Mathieu Guillaume <mat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 24 May 2006 15:12:17 +0200 |
| Delivery-date: | Wed, 24 May 2006 06:13:55 -0700 |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| Sender: | xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060522) |
Is there any common reason why my network interface in a paravirtualized host would show up as eth1, but without an eth0 in the system? My vif line just says vif=['bridge=xenbr0'], and if I configure eth1 manually from whithin the guest it works fine, but I find it kinda weird. This is with xen-unstable from 05/23, and the systems (both dom0 and domU) are kubuntu dapper. _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Xen-users] HVM and physical VDBs, Mathieu Guillaume |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Xen-users] bridge or nat ??, Yura Pismerov |
| Previous by Thread: | [Xen-users] HVM and physical VDBs, Mathieu Guillaume |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-users] vif showing up as eth1 (no eth0), Michael Vrable |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
