WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] Re: Re: Redundant server setup

To: "Per Andreas Buer" <per.buer@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Re: Re: Redundant server setup
From: "Paul M." <paul@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 12:21:35 -0400
Cc: Matthew Wild <M.Wild@xxxxxxxx>, xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Tue, 23 May 2006 09:22:39 -0700
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=DV0TsQk8ULq3T03TJQO+4HRCADv3kFGlDGyUOiWycSQhV5LyhcdLp+pIv+IdH23Bvvg78P1dA/B5XrB3Aqh+lViekR7dVzq0t8xLC8xs9JSNJ48KThVa4cI65pw59sjMQvKbnLQtPr83bJ0mOdUTICfG1qP540c0w+CoiMfQb0o=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <C3DBD9A5-0850-495D-B18E-95BFFF766E21@xxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <20060511211348.GB14781@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <200605120938.10339.M.Wild@xxxxxxxx> <20060512120301.GB3130@xxxxxxxxxxx> <200605121431.35988.M.Wild@xxxxxxxx> <C3DBD9A5-0850-495D-B18E-95BFFF766E21@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On 5/22/06, Per Andreas Buer <per.buer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 12. mai. 2006, at 15:31, Matthew Wild wrote:

> But as far as I can see, DRBD only provides twin machine shared
> storage. I
> have a few servers I want to use as dom0s and since they are
> generally simple
> 1U boxes I want them as clean from local storage as possible. The
> NAS box is
> bigger and generally better protected with redundant PSU, hardware
> RAID with
> hotswap spares etc. If I could pair two machines like that and then
> offer
> storage to the dom0s from that redundant pair that would be better.

Buy two servers, use DRBD between them and share the storage with
gnbd. gnbd seems to be quite stable and easy to manage. Besides - it
does not exhibit any of the strange issues people see with iSCSI when
under load.


If you have a few machines to devote to file storage than a cluster
file system is the best way to go. Having dom0 on each of the machines
provide a CFS<-->NFS bridge for the domUs and a Nagios server running
to monitor services/domU's and restart on other machines if needed
would provide a system with the network being the only single point of
failure. And that could be taken care of too....
-Paul

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users