xen-users

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Xen-users] Domain-0 MEM = no limit?

from [Seneca]

[Permanent Link][Original]

To:	xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject:	Re: [Xen-users] Domain-0 MEM = no limit?
From:	Seneca <acenes@xxxxxxx>
Date:	Fri, 28 Apr 2006 07:50:08 +0200
Delivery-date:	Thu, 27 Apr 2006 22:50:49 -0700
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<5bdb1aa70604271555y44c0e1dcq3cbd59d56ebddc47@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References:	<5bdb1aa70604271555y44c0e1dcq3cbd59d56ebddc47@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to:	Seneca <acenes@xxxxxxx>
Sender:	xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

I guess this is related to the boot option mem=

Read the details about it in the manual:

http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/Research/SRG/netos/xen/readmes/user/user.html#SECTION04130000000000000000

-- 
Seneca


You wrote at Freitag, 28. April 2006 00:55:

S> I was just checking the output of xentop and noticed that Domain-0 has
S> a listing of "no limit" for the MEM(k). Is this correct, even tho i
S> have "dom0_mem=262144" set in the /boot/grub/menu.lst file:

S> title       Xen 3.0.0 - Linux 2.6.12.6-xen
S> kernel      /boot/xen-3.0.1.gz dom0_mem=262144
S> module      /boot/xen-linux-2.6.12.6-xen root=/dev/sda1 ro
S> module      /boot/xen-modules-2.6.12.6-xen

S> Output of xentop:

S> xentop - 10:52:15   Xen 3.0.1
S> 7 domains: 1 running, 6 blocked, 0 paused, 0 crashed, 0 dying, 0 shutdown
S> Mem: 1571884k total, 1554104k used, 17780k free    CPUs: 2 @ 3000MHz
S>       NAME  STATE   CPU(sec) CPU(%)     MEM(k) MEM(%)  MAXMEM(k)
S> MAXMEM(%) VCPUS NETS NETTX(k) NETRX(k) SSID
S>     access --b---         47    0.0      65404    4.2      65536      
S> 4.2     1    1     8419    62465    0
S>        dev --b---       3014    0.1     524104   33.3     524288     
S> 33.4     1    1  2491711  3792737    0
S>   Domain-0 -----r       7562    0.2     221212   14.1   no limit      
S> n/a     2    8   320320  2054686    0
S> eyvisualasset --b---        183    0.0     130936    8.3     139264   
S>    8.9     1    1      446     5515    0
S>  filespace --b---        188    0.1     259956   16.5     268288     
S> 17.1     1    1     1335     5433    0
S>    monitor --b---        120    0.0      65304    4.2      73728      
S> 4.7     1    1      911     5901    0
S>        mx2 --b---        191    0.0     261992   16.7     270336     
S> 17.2     1    1     1245    11307    0

S> Regards,

S> Simon

S> _______________________________________________
S> Xen-users mailing list
S> Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
S> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users


_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[Xen-users] Domain-0 MEM = no limit?, Simon Re: [Xen-users] Domain-0 MEM = no limit?, Seneca <=

Previous by Date:	Re: [Xen-users] Device 0 (vif) could nto be connected: backend device not found, Nivedita Singhvi
Next by Date:	[Xen-users] NFS problems in guest, Itai Tavor
Previous by Thread:	[Xen-users] Domain-0 MEM = no limit?, Simon
Next by Thread:	[Xen-users] Re: [Fedora-xen] Xen Crash at Boot on Dell PE 830 Running FC 5, Demetri Mouratis
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]