|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] cluster filesystems
At 04:07 PM 4/11/2006, you wrote:
eah ocfs2 is a file system, I realized the miss wording after i
replied my apologies. Im thinking yes they would have to be files,
which isnt ideal, but again im looking for migration with
survivability in a block device (host) failing.
Which is why I think GNBD is a good solution, especially if you want
block devices instead of a network/cluster filesystem. I understand,
as I'm trying to get the same thing going... You would have 2
servers running drbd0.8 (active-active) and GNBD multipath. I think
this might be the only truly fault tolerant solution that doesn't use
a network/cluster filesystem. You can accomplish the same thing with
drbd0.7, but it takes more fiddling and you loose multipath.
active active drbd would still require a cluster file system such as ocfs2
Or GNBD, which is a cluster aware way of exporting block
devices. Multiple dom0's can then access all of the block devices,
allowing for live migration.
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Xen-users] cluster filesystems, (continued)
- Re: [Xen-users] cluster filesystems, Brock Edward Palen
- Re: [Xen-users] cluster filesystems, Peter Fokkinga
- Re: [Xen-users] cluster filesystems, Andrej Radonic
- Re: [Xen-users] cluster filesystems, Christopher G. Stach II
- Re: [Xen-users] cluster filesystems, Peter Fokkinga
- Re: [Xen-users] cluster filesystems, Ralf Schenk
- Re: [Xen-users] cluster filesystems, Brock Edward Palen
- Re: [Xen-users] cluster filesystems, Mark Petersen
- Re: [Xen-users] cluster filesystems, Brock Edward Palen
- Re: [Xen-users] cluster filesystems, John Madden
- Re: [Xen-users] cluster filesystems,
Mark Petersen <=
- Re: [Xen-users] cluster filesystems, John Hearns
- Re: [Xen-users] cluster filesystems, Mark Petersen
|
|
|
|
|