WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 		  
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [Xen-users] routed networking xen3.0.1

from [Anand Gupta] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] routed networking xen3.0.1
From: Anand Gupta <xen.mails@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2006 18:58:43 +0530
Delivery-date: Mon, 06 Feb 2006 13:39:43 +0000
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=FLyKBZ9G5XLMPcq+IpDFKR7bwJELgSpogh7XVh0gJdCpCzfeGymCNGxM5coS1lroqWxxfeddHG9t50wE5VBVSGDhwoUo9c/hteoPprpRqrlx/NKrKW4MT4xSvDaDUEvqbTEK18DdoJdPZ+XsCwGtQuyunfFSs8eT0L6iiu8O3zY=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <acb757c00602060512q192b9905x23f17d5abada462e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <acb757c00602052227p14f33828o22fc785f3a90c322@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20060206122748.GB7920@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <acb757c00602060452y6d7716bfh8e5107ddfc2bf966@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20060206130933.GD7920@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <acb757c00602060512q192b9905x23f17d5abada462e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shouldn't the vif-route be adding the route in dom0?

On 2/6/06, Anand Gupta <xen.mails@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 2/6/06, CJ van den Berg < cj@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The route output in dom0 would complete the picture.

Kernel IP routing table
Destination     Gateway         Genmask         Flags Metric Ref    Use Iface
192.168.1.0      0.0.0.0         255.255.255.0   U     0      0        0 eth0
169.254.0.0     0.0.0.0          255.255.0.0     U     0      0        0 eth0
 0.0.0.0         192.168.1.1     0.0.0.0         UG    0      0        0 eth0


--
regards,

Anand Gupta 
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  [Xen-users] Re: Unable to have more than 3 interfaces in domU, Anders Siverby
Next by Date:  Re: [Xen-users] routed networking xen3.0.1, CJ van den Berg
Previous by Thread:  Re: [Xen-users] routed networking xen3.0.1, Anand Gupta
Next by Thread:  Re: [Xen-users] routed networking xen3.0.1, CJ van den Berg
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]
 
   

Copyright , Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy