WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

RE: [Xen-users] Re: No VMX-guests on Intel Xeon/VT

To: "Thorolf Godawa" <Thorolf@xxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [Xen-users] Re: No VMX-guests on Intel Xeon/VT
From: "Petersson, Mats" <Mats.Petersson@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 12:51:23 +0100
Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Thu, 02 Feb 2006 12:02:07 +0000
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcYn4jaFSEm1L3isS7mYXxkBXQ9EMgAC2Hvg
Thread-topic: [Xen-users] Re: No VMX-guests on Intel Xeon/VT
> -----Original Message-----
> From: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
> Thorolf Godawa
> Sent: 02 February 2006 02:30
> To: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [Xen-users] Re: No VMX-guests on Intel Xeon/VT
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> OK, I've installed possibly all needed packages on SL10.1b2 
> but the VNC-stuff still is not working :-(
> 
> So right now I'm downloading the latest SLES 10-beta-code 
> from the Novell-side and hopefully it is working with that - 
> this is plan A!
> 
> Plan B is compiling XEN by myself, so acording to the docs 
> I've installed the following (or it was already installed):
> python-devel, zlib-devel, LibVNCServer, SDL-devel, 
> bridge-utils, iproute2, udev, dev86-0.16.0-187.i586.rpm
> 
> Then I downloaded and untared xen-3.0.1-src.tgz, to build it 
> I'm doing:
> 
> # make KERNELS=linux-2.6-xen world > make01.log
> 
> The first part seems to run without problems, at least I 
> don't find errors or warnings in the log:
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------
>    ...
>    Install prefix    usr
>    BIOS directory    /usr/share/xen/qemu
>    binary directory  /usr/bin
>    Manual directory  /usr/share/man
>    Source path       /data/xen/2install/xen301/xen-3.0.1/tools/ioemu
>    C compiler        gcc
>    make              make
>    host CPU          amd64
>    host big endian   no
>    target list       target-i386-dm
>    gprof enabled     no
>    static build      no
>    VNC support       yes
>    SDL support       yes
>    SDL static link   yes
>    mingw32 support   no
>    Adlib support     no
>    FMOD support      no
>    ...
>    make[3]: Leaving directory
> `/data/xen/2install/xen301/xen-3.0.1/xen/arch/x86'
>    make[2]: Leaving directory 
> `/data/xen/2install/xen301/xen-3.0.1/xen'
>    make[1]: Leaving directory `/data/xen/2install/xen301/xen-3.0.1'
> ------------------------------------------------------
> 
> It doesn't matter that the "host CPU" is an "amd64" if in 
> truth its a Xeon with EM64T?

AMD64 is funcationality-wise compatible with EM64T (or to be
historically correct, Intel copied AMD64 to make EM64T) - there are some
minor differences, but none that matters to QEMU. 
> 
> And what means "target list       target-i386-dm", does it 
> mean that the 
> compiled binaries are only for i386? I need them for x86-64, 
> if it's not correct where do I change it?

That's fine - works fine on my AMD64-system, and that's straight out of
the Xen-unstable tree - AMD has made no modifications to this, it's all
been in there since Intel first introduced the code into Xen. [I don't
have an Intel system to compare with, but it should make no difference
at all]. 

> 
> Unfortunately only the first part of the compilation runs, then I get:
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------
>    readlink: missing operand
>    Try `readlink --help' for more information.
>     __  __            _____  ___   _
>     \ \/ /___ _ __   |___ / / _ \ / |
>      \  // _ \ '_ \    |_ \| | | || |
>      /  \  __/ | | |  ___) | |_| || |
>     /_/\_\___|_| |_| |____(_)___(_)_|
> 
>    cc1: warnings being treated as errors
>    In file included from
> /data/xen/2install/xen301/xen-3.0.1/xen/include/asm/mpspec.h:5,
>                     from
> /data/xen/2install/xen301/xen-3.0.1/xen/include/asm/smp.h:18,
>                     from
> /data/xen/2install/xen301/xen-3.0.1/xen/include/xen/smp.h:13,
>                     from
> /data/xen/2install/xen301/xen-3.0.1/xen/include/xen/sched.h:8,
>                     from x86_64/asm-offsets.c:9:
>    
> /data/xen/2install/xen301/xen-3.0.1/xen/include/asm/mpspec_def.h:78: 
> warning: ?packed? attribute ignored for field of type 
> ?unsigned char[5u]?
>    make[3]: *** [asm-offsets.s] Error 1
>    make[2]: *** [/data/xen/2install/xen301/xen-3.0.1/xen/xen] Error 2
>    make[1]: *** [install-xen] Error 2
>    make: *** [world] Error 2
> ------------------------------------------------------

What version of gcc are you using? 4.0.2?

You can probably just (at your own peril, of course) remove -Werror from
the CFLAGS line in .../xen/arch/x86/Rules.mk (around line 11). 

However, I'm not sure that you actually need to build Xen itself -
perhaps you can just go down to the .../tools/ioemu and do "make clean;
make" there. As the problem you're seeing appears to be related to
qemu-dm. Then copy target-i386-dm/qemu-dm to /usr/lib64/xen/bin [on your
target system, if you're not compiling and running Xen on the same
system]. 

Note: .../ represents the "Xen root directory", such as
~/xen-unstable.hg or whatever it may be. 

Best of luck. 

--
Mats

> 
> I'm not a c-programmer, so possibly I'm not goinig to fix 
> this in the sources or is there s.th. else wrong in the way 
> I'm going to compile the package for me?
> 
> Again thanks a lot for all the help I got in these news-groups!
> -- 
> 
> Chau y hasta luego,
> 
> Thorolf
> 


_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>