|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-users
Re: Using the -xen kernel rather than -xen0/U was [Xen-users] Poorhard d
Thanks for the reply Ian. Fernando on this list told me about the vifname parameter being excluded from xen 3.0 (doesn't work either when i try to use it inside the config) and was reincluded in unstable, any ideas when it would make it to the stable /rpm.
On 12/31/05, Ian Pratt <m+Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I used the xen 3.0 rpm's from xensource on centos 4.1, and > was kind of surprised to see a single kernel. Now seeing > these posts explains it. > > Thanks guys for such a nice job :) >
> Would love to see more detailed explanation for building the kernel.
The one below is actually pretty good.
> Would you advise to keep using the rpm or compile the kernel > for production use ?
I see no reason not to use the RPMs. The current plan is to update them every week or so with just bug fixes, stepping a 4th digit (like Linux). 3.0.0.1 etc.
Ian
>
> On 12/31/05, David H < davidh.davidh@xxxxxxxxx > <mailto:davidh.davidh@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > >users really should be using the -xen kernel rather
> than -xen0/U. > > This is very good advice, and easy to follow. If you > are building Xen > for testing or production use the "xen" kenel. It is > much more like
> the kenel in most distributions, everything compiled as > a module. > > Just edit the top level Makefile so that this line: > > KERNELS ?= linux-2.6-xen0 linux-2.6-xenU
> > looks like this > > KERNELS ?= linux-2.6-xen > > You will get a single kernel and modules which can be > used for both > Domain0 and all DomainUs.
> > Copy the modules directory /lib/modules/2.6.whatever-xen to the > /lib/modules directory of your VM and make an initrd > with mkinitrd. > You will need to add the initrd to your grub config.
> > Takes a little longer to build the kernel this way, but for most > people it is much easier to deal with. > > If this is not documented it should be. I will take a
> look at the > wiki over the weekend and add something if it is not > already there. > > David > > > > On 12/30/05, Eric S. Johansson <
esj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Ian Pratt wrote: > > > I know everyone always ignores me whenever I say > this, but users really > > > should be using the -xen kernel rather than
> -xen0/U. The latter two are > > > just to make build times quicker for developers. > The -xen kernel has way > > > more drivers, though built as modules, so you'll > need to make an initrd.
> > > > > > > http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/Research/SRG/netos/xen/readmes/user/us > er.html#SECTION02140000000000000000
> > > > section 2.4.2 building from source > > --- > > > > unless I'm missing something, the official docs say > nothing about a -xen > > kernel (and modules). what are more appropriate
> instructions for building? > > > > --- eric > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Xen-users mailing list > >
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users > <
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users> > > > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-users mailing list >
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users > <http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
> > > > >
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: Using the -xen kernel rather than -xen0/U was [Xen-users] Poorhard disk performance on xen-3/dom0,
Anand <=
|
|
|
|
|