WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

RE: [Xen-users] RE: Tutorial : Debian, Xen and CLUSTER / GFS Supp ort

To: Molle Bestefich <molle.bestefich@xxxxxxxxx>, xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [Xen-users] RE: Tutorial : Debian, Xen and CLUSTER / GFS Supp ort
From: PAINCHAUD Christophe <cpainchaud@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 11:57:17 +0100
Delivery-date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 10:57:17 +0000
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

>In theory.  In practice, the snapshot target is horribly unstable and
>will nuke your data sooner rather than later :-).

I read on LVM2 ML that many fixes for snapshots were released and that it is
much more stable. I'am trying to use snapshot features under heavy IO stress
and so far no problem. I will test and dig a bit more in the ML to be sure
that is working as intended. I will soon put my solution in production so my
boss will get mad at me if it fails 2 months after its launch :p

Thank you for your comment on this. 


Christophe PAINCHAUD

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users