|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-users
RE: [Xen-users] veth0 is from netback and vifu.0isfromthebridge-utils?
> > When you run xend it runs network-bridge which creates the bridge,
> > renames eth0->peth0 and veth0->eth0 and brings the new eth0 back up.
>
> kewl, thx Ian. i see network-route doesnt do this. i think
> thats a good thing. do you forsee that changing?
I expect that in most routed configurations people use their own network
script rather than using the default. I'm not sure the current
network-route script even handles configuration of vif0.0/veth0 devices.
It's only really an issue if you run network services for other VMs in
domain0, but its better to have the default of using vif0.0/veth0 incase
people do.
I was in two minds about the interface renaming, but it proved to be the
only way we could get a script working reliably on a wide range of
distros, and once you know what's happening its not too confusing.
Ian
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread> |
- RE: [Xen-users] veth0 is from netback and vifu.0isfromthebridge-utils?,
Ian Pratt <=
|
|
|
|
|