|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] Very Basic Question
> Sidequestion: You can actually tell xen to make certain cards (basing on
> their pci addresses) to not be seen by dom0. Thus they can be used *by one*
> (am I right?) domU. So what if I don't show dom0 the video-card?
That might work. I can say I've ever tried booting Linux without a video
card, though.
> Depending on the dom0-OS, it may even work that dom0 can still show up
> stuff (totally unsure, I am have not yet begun reading VGA-specs or alike
> ;-) ) however, just a sitenote.
Probably depends on the version of Xen too - I think Xen 3.0 is a bit stricter
about IO privileges.
> I actually started to setup my Xen-puter with two VGA-cards, so that'd be
> another possibility basing on the above assumption(s).
A few people have been trying to get a second graphics card (and USB keyboard,
mouse) running in a second domain. They haven't managed it (AFAIK - please
let us know if you have) yet but hopefully they'll get it working some time.
It's certainly something we'd like to see.
> But now that is all a bit hackish, it would be interesting to see a real
> hardware-API here; virtual-soundcards, virtual video-devices, and so on
> and so forth.
With Intel's LaGrande security tech (AMD have a similar thing but I can't
remember the name) we'll be able to regulate things much better so that we
don't have to trust domains with direct hardware access. We'll be able t
control where they may DMA to, etc. This also implies most fault-resistant
driver domains will be possible.
Cheers,
Mark
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
|
|
|
|