Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Modify to introduce delayed p2m table destruction

[Isaku Yamahata <yamahata@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, Nov 20, 2006 at 01:08:38PM +0900, Doi.Tsunehisa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> You (yamahata) said:
> >>   We have studied it. So, we think that we can't realize to defer
> >> p2m table destruction with the convension. Thus, we'll take anothor
> >> approach to avoid the hypervisor hang. Basicaly, we'll introduce a
> >> reference count of p2m table like page struct.
> > 
> > Why do you think so?
> > I believe that it is possible without such a reference count.
> 
>   At first, we think that we can't realize to defer p2m table destruction
> because the convention requires that p2m table exists while page struct
> exists.

Hmm. Then I'll take care of it.
It would be after xenoprof/ia64, /dev/mem and other urgent issues, though.

-- 
yamahata

_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel