Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Modify to introduce delayed p2m table destruction

[Isaku Yamahata <yamahata@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, Nov 20, 2006 at 10:30:56AM +0900, Doi.Tsunehisa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>   We have studied it. So, we think that we can't realize to defer
> p2m table destruction with the convension. Thus, we'll take anothor
> approach to avoid the hypervisor hang. Basicaly, we'll introduce a
> reference count of p2m table like page struct.

Why do you think so?
I believe that it is possible without such a reference count.
-- 
yamahata

_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel