|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] X86 MCE: Add SRAR handler
Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 30.09.11 at 11:42, "Liu, Jinsong" <jinsong.liu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>>> On 30.09.11 at 10:21, "Liu, Jinsong" <jinsong.liu@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>> Executing guest code will not satisfy the check
>>>> if ( !(gstatus & MCG_STATUS_RIPV) && !guest_mode(regs)) return -1;
>>>> so it would not panic system.
>>>
>>> Exactly. But it should when the prefetch was to hypervisor code.
>>>
>>
>> Wouldn't processor refresh instruction prefetch queue under such
>> case?
>
> That's a question that you are better positioned to answer than me.
> But the SRAR errors being a sub-category of uncorrected errors I
> would think it can't be that simple.
>
Hmm, I will check this question internally first.
BTW, we would have 7 days holiday (1/10 ~ 7/10), so email reply maybe some slow.
Thanks,
Jinsong
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH] X86 MCE: Add SRAR handler, Liu, Jinsong
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] X86 MCE: Add SRAR handler, Jan Beulich
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] X86 MCE: Add SRAR handler, Jiang, Yunhong
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] X86 MCE: Add SRAR handler, Jan Beulich
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] X86 MCE: Add SRAR handler, Liu, Jinsong
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] X86 MCE: Add SRAR handler, Jan Beulich
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] X86 MCE: Add SRAR handler, Liu, Jinsong
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] X86 MCE: Add SRAR handler, Jan Beulich
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] X86 MCE: Add SRAR handler, Liu, Jinsong
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] X86 MCE: Add SRAR handler, Jan Beulich
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] X86 MCE: Add SRAR handler,
Liu, Jinsong <=
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] X86 MCE: Add SRAR handler, Liu, Jinsong
|
|
|
|
|