|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] X86 MCE: Add SRAR handler
>>> On 30.09.11 at 11:42, "Liu, Jinsong" <jinsong.liu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>> On 30.09.11 at 10:21, "Liu, Jinsong" <jinsong.liu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Executing guest code will not satisfy the check
>>> if ( !(gstatus & MCG_STATUS_RIPV) && !guest_mode(regs)) return -1;
>>> so it would not panic system.
>>
>> Exactly. But it should when the prefetch was to hypervisor code.
>>
>
> Wouldn't processor refresh instruction prefetch queue under such case?
That's a question that you are better positioned to answer than me.
But the SRAR errors being a sub-category of uncorrected errors I
would think it can't be that simple.
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH] X86 MCE: Add SRAR handler, Liu, Jinsong
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] X86 MCE: Add SRAR handler, Jan Beulich
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] X86 MCE: Add SRAR handler, Jiang, Yunhong
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] X86 MCE: Add SRAR handler, Jan Beulich
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] X86 MCE: Add SRAR handler, Liu, Jinsong
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] X86 MCE: Add SRAR handler, Jan Beulich
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] X86 MCE: Add SRAR handler, Liu, Jinsong
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] X86 MCE: Add SRAR handler, Jan Beulich
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] X86 MCE: Add SRAR handler, Liu, Jinsong
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] X86 MCE: Add SRAR handler,
Jan Beulich <=
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] X86 MCE: Add SRAR handler, Liu, Jinsong
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] X86 MCE: Add SRAR handler, Liu, Jinsong
|
|
|
|
|