|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] RE: Stability report GPLPV 0.11.0.308
Hello James,
the torture test of GPLPV 0.11.0.312 failed (as 0.11.0.308 did). What
really puzzles me is that the uptime was 9-10 days for both VMs (as in
0.11.0.308). One could think that there is something about the uptime of
9-10 days. There is no noticeable malfunction in dom0 and while the
domUs were running they looked perfectly. Really odd.
Regards Andreas
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] Stability report GPLPV 0.11.0.308, Andreas Kinzler
- [Xen-devel] RE: Stability report GPLPV 0.11.0.308, James Harper
- [Xen-devel] Re: Stability report GPLPV 0.11.0.308, Andreas Kinzler
- [Xen-devel] RE: Stability report GPLPV 0.11.0.308, James Harper
- Re: [Xen-devel] RE: Stability report GPLPV 0.11.0.308, Andreas Kinzler
- Re: [Xen-devel] RE: Stability report GPLPV 0.11.0.308,
Andreas Kinzler <=
- RE: [Xen-devel] RE: Stability report GPLPV 0.11.0.308, James Harper
- Re: [Xen-devel] RE: Stability report GPLPV 0.11.0.308, Andreas Kinzler
- RE: [Xen-devel] RE: Stability report GPLPV 0.11.0.308, James Harper
- Re: [Xen-devel] RE: Stability report GPLPV 0.11.0.308, Andreas Kinzler
- RE: [Xen-devel] RE: Stability report GPLPV 0.11.0.308, James Harper
- Re: [Xen-devel] RE: Stability report GPLPV 0.11.0.308, Andreas Kinzler
- RE: [Xen-devel] RE: Stability report GPLPV 0.11.0.308, James Harper
- RE: [Xen-devel] RE: Stability report GPLPV 0.11.0.308, James Harper
- Re: [Xen-devel] RE: Stability report GPLPV 0.11.0.308, Andreas Kinzler
- RE: [Xen-devel] RE: Stability report GPLPV 0.11.0.308, James Harper
|
|
|
|
|