On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 05:08:06AM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > Rawhide just came out with 3.1.0-0.rc6.git0.0.fc17.x86_64 , and the BUG:s
> > are
> > still the same as in the last log I sent. However, as promised I have
> > attached
> > the initcall_debug log, but for rc6.
>
> Hey Jim,
>
> We are quite sure we know the cause of this. I was wondering if you would be
> up for beta-testing a patch for this?
Specifically this patch seems to fix it for me:
commit 690dc11498b192db25762de77988224753517c96
Author: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed Sep 14 05:10:00 2011 -0400
xen/irq: Alter the locking to be a mutex.
When we allocate/change the IRQ informations, we do not
need to use a psinlock. We can use a mutex (which is
what the generic IRQ code does for allocations/changes.
Suggested-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
diff --git a/drivers/xen/events.c b/drivers/xen/events.c
index da70f5c..7523719 100644
--- a/drivers/xen/events.c
+++ b/drivers/xen/events.c
@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@
* This lock protects updates to the following mapping and reference-count
* arrays. The lock does not need to be acquired to read the mapping tables.
*/
-static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(irq_mapping_update_lock);
+static DEFINE_MUTEX(irq_mapping_update_lock);
static LIST_HEAD(xen_irq_list_head);
@@ -631,7 +631,7 @@ int xen_bind_pirq_gsi_to_irq(unsigned gsi,
int irq = -1;
struct physdev_irq irq_op;
- spin_lock(&irq_mapping_update_lock);
+ mutex_lock(&irq_mapping_update_lock);
irq = find_irq_by_gsi(gsi);
if (irq != -1) {
@@ -684,7 +684,7 @@ int xen_bind_pirq_gsi_to_irq(unsigned gsi,
handle_edge_irq, name);
out:
- spin_unlock(&irq_mapping_update_lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&irq_mapping_update_lock);
return irq;
}
@@ -710,7 +710,7 @@ int xen_bind_pirq_msi_to_irq(struct pci_dev *dev, struct
msi_desc *msidesc,
{
int irq, ret;
- spin_lock(&irq_mapping_update_lock);
+ mutex_lock(&irq_mapping_update_lock);
irq = xen_allocate_irq_dynamic();
if (irq == -1)
@@ -724,10 +724,10 @@ int xen_bind_pirq_msi_to_irq(struct pci_dev *dev, struct
msi_desc *msidesc,
if (ret < 0)
goto error_irq;
out:
- spin_unlock(&irq_mapping_update_lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&irq_mapping_update_lock);
return irq;
error_irq:
- spin_unlock(&irq_mapping_update_lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&irq_mapping_update_lock);
xen_free_irq(irq);
return -1;
}
@@ -740,7 +740,7 @@ int xen_destroy_irq(int irq)
struct irq_info *info = info_for_irq(irq);
int rc = -ENOENT;
- spin_lock(&irq_mapping_update_lock);
+ mutex_lock(&irq_mapping_update_lock);
desc = irq_to_desc(irq);
if (!desc)
@@ -766,7 +766,7 @@ int xen_destroy_irq(int irq)
xen_free_irq(irq);
out:
- spin_unlock(&irq_mapping_update_lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&irq_mapping_update_lock);
return rc;
}
@@ -776,7 +776,7 @@ int xen_irq_from_pirq(unsigned pirq)
struct irq_info *info;
- spin_lock(&irq_mapping_update_lock);
+ mutex_lock(&irq_mapping_update_lock);
list_for_each_entry(info, &xen_irq_list_head, list) {
if (info == NULL || info->type != IRQT_PIRQ)
@@ -787,7 +787,7 @@ int xen_irq_from_pirq(unsigned pirq)
}
irq = -1;
out:
- spin_unlock(&irq_mapping_update_lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&irq_mapping_update_lock);
return irq;
}
@@ -802,7 +802,7 @@ int bind_evtchn_to_irq(unsigned int evtchn)
{
int irq;
- spin_lock(&irq_mapping_update_lock);
+ mutex_lock(&irq_mapping_update_lock);
irq = evtchn_to_irq[evtchn];
@@ -818,7 +818,7 @@ int bind_evtchn_to_irq(unsigned int evtchn)
}
out:
- spin_unlock(&irq_mapping_update_lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&irq_mapping_update_lock);
return irq;
}
@@ -829,7 +829,7 @@ static int bind_ipi_to_irq(unsigned int ipi, unsigned int
cpu)
struct evtchn_bind_ipi bind_ipi;
int evtchn, irq;
- spin_lock(&irq_mapping_update_lock);
+ mutex_lock(&irq_mapping_update_lock);
irq = per_cpu(ipi_to_irq, cpu)[ipi];
@@ -853,7 +853,7 @@ static int bind_ipi_to_irq(unsigned int ipi, unsigned int
cpu)
}
out:
- spin_unlock(&irq_mapping_update_lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&irq_mapping_update_lock);
return irq;
}
@@ -878,7 +878,7 @@ int bind_virq_to_irq(unsigned int virq, unsigned int cpu)
struct evtchn_bind_virq bind_virq;
int evtchn, irq;
- spin_lock(&irq_mapping_update_lock);
+ mutex_lock(&irq_mapping_update_lock);
irq = per_cpu(virq_to_irq, cpu)[virq];
@@ -903,7 +903,7 @@ int bind_virq_to_irq(unsigned int virq, unsigned int cpu)
}
out:
- spin_unlock(&irq_mapping_update_lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&irq_mapping_update_lock);
return irq;
}
@@ -913,7 +913,7 @@ static void unbind_from_irq(unsigned int irq)
struct evtchn_close close;
int evtchn = evtchn_from_irq(irq);
- spin_lock(&irq_mapping_update_lock);
+ mutex_lock(&irq_mapping_update_lock);
if (VALID_EVTCHN(evtchn)) {
close.port = evtchn;
@@ -943,7 +943,7 @@ static void unbind_from_irq(unsigned int irq)
xen_free_irq(irq);
- spin_unlock(&irq_mapping_update_lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&irq_mapping_update_lock);
}
int bind_evtchn_to_irqhandler(unsigned int evtchn,
@@ -1279,7 +1279,7 @@ void rebind_evtchn_irq(int evtchn, int irq)
will also be masked. */
disable_irq(irq);
- spin_lock(&irq_mapping_update_lock);
+ mutex_lock(&irq_mapping_update_lock);
/* After resume the irq<->evtchn mappings are all cleared out */
BUG_ON(evtchn_to_irq[evtchn] != -1);
@@ -1289,7 +1289,7 @@ void rebind_evtchn_irq(int evtchn, int irq)
xen_irq_info_evtchn_init(irq, evtchn);
- spin_unlock(&irq_mapping_update_lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&irq_mapping_update_lock);
/* new event channels are always bound to cpu 0 */
irq_set_affinity(irq, cpumask_of(0));
mutex_instead_of_spinlock.patch
Description: Text Data
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|