WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] Re: linux-next: manual merge of the xen tree with the tip tr

To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-devel] Re: linux-next: manual merge of the xen tree with the tip tree
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 10:48:24 +1000
Cc: Xen Devel <Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-next@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 17:49:12 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20110914103234.4f2f6a2dd65734de6622e79f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <20110825142450.c84e02d8763cfd1a93411844@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4E5690C3.2050706@xxxxxxxx> <4E5693DD.2010307@xxxxxxxxx> <20110826090619.7588d424798f53a6f3621eb2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4E56D6E1.6030405@xxxxxxxxx> <20110826125441.709aa423cdf072ce085fb91c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110913211154.fe53ca8c1d608def77a69022@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <alpine.LFD.2.02.1109131706410.2723@ionos> <4E6FC2D3.2060408@xxxxxxxx> <20110914103234.4f2f6a2dd65734de6622e79f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi all,

On Wed, 14 Sep 2011 10:32:34 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
wrote:
>
> My understanding is this:  I do *not* need to revert the spinlock changes
> from tip anymore, correct?

Right, having looked at the tip tree, they are not in there any more.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

Attachment: pgpfHaV22rBn3.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel