WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] Re: linux-next: manual merge of the xen tree with the tip tr

To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-devel] Re: linux-next: manual merge of the xen tree with the tip tree
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 13:53:39 -0700
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Xen Devel <Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-next@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 13:55:46 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1109131706410.2723@ionos>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <20110825142450.c84e02d8763cfd1a93411844@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4E5690C3.2050706@xxxxxxxx> <4E5693DD.2010307@xxxxxxxxx> <20110826090619.7588d424798f53a6f3621eb2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4E56D6E1.6030405@xxxxxxxxx> <20110826125441.709aa423cdf072ce085fb91c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110913211154.fe53ca8c1d608def77a69022@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <alpine.LFD.2.02.1109131706410.2723@ionos>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:6.0.2) Gecko/20110906 Thunderbird/6.0.2
On 09/13/2011 08:07 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Sep 2011, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Fri, 26 Aug 2011 12:54:41 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
>> wrote:
>>> On Thu, 25 Aug 2011 16:12:33 -0700 "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> On 08/25/2011 04:06 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>>>>> Stephen: the x86/spinlocks branch in the -tip tree is obsolete and
>>>>>> should be dropped.
>>>>> That's a bit tricky as I get a rolled up tip tree.  The best I could do
>>>>> is revert the commit that merges the x86/spinlocks branch into
>>>>> auto-latest ...  I'll do that for today (unless something happens to the
>>>>> tip tree in the next hour).
>>>>>
>>>> OK, let me bother Ingo about it.
>>> For today, I have done "git revert -m 1 6f8fa39c81f1" after merging the
>>> tip tree.
>> I am still doing this in each linux-next, and it doesn't appear to have
>> been fixed up the the tree on tesla.tglx.de, yet, I think.
> We'll take it out. 

Actually, the tip x86/spinlocks was the most up-to-date version of those
patches (since hpa had rebased them to a more recent version of mainline).

But never mind.  Stephen, could you use

    git://github.com/jsgf/linux-xen.git upstream/xen

for linux-next instead of the kernel.org xen.git, and I've re-added the
up-to-date spinlock changes there.

Thanks,
    J

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel