| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
RE: [Xen-devel] About the oprofile tools and related profiling tools
Thanks Mike. I can try you latest patch and see what happened to HVM guest:)
-----Original Message-----
From: W. Michael Petullo [mailto:mike@xxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2011 12:21 AM
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
Cc: Lv, Hui; George Dunlap; dunlapg@xxxxxxxxx; xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] About the oprofile tools and related profiling tools
>> Thanks Konrad and George!
>>
>> I have tried Mike Petullo's patched pvops domain0 and xenoprofile on it can
>> work.
>>
>> But I did not get the right sample results of HVM guest (No samples
>> obtained). So I guess, something should be wrong from hypervisor part
>> in profiling HVM guest.
>>
>> So did anyone successfully profile the HVM based guest using this patch?
> You might want to email Mike to ask that.
I have only used my variation of the 2.6.39 OProfile patch to passively
profile a PV kernel. Note that most of the work was done previously;
all I did was port it to Linux 2.6.39. I have not tried it on a HVM
kernel. My latest 2.6.39 patch is at:
http://www.flyn.org/patches/linux-xen-passive-oprofile/linux-2.6.39.rc5.git5-xen-passive-oprofile.patch.gz
--
Mike
:wq
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home