This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Home Products Support Community News


Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] libxc: use correct macro when unmapping memory a

To: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] libxc: use correct macro when unmapping memory after save operation
From: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 17:18:50 +0100
Cc: Jim Fehlig <jfehlig@xxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Tue, 24 May 2011 09:24:38 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <CA0192B3.2DA37%keir@xxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <4DDBBFF1.4050905@xxxxxxxxxx> <CA0192B3.2DA37%keir@xxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Keir Fraser writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] libxc: use correct macro when 
unmapping memory after save operation"):
> On 24/05/2011 15:25, "Jim Fehlig" <jfehlig@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > BTW, thanks for the commit message note about "backporting to relevant
> > earlier trees".  I was going to ask that this be applied to
> > 4.1-testing.  Should such a statement be included for fixes that apply
> > to multiple trees?  Is it helpful for scanning potential backports in
> > -unstable?
> Worth pointing out that at the moment only I seem to be backporting to the
> stable trees, and I only do that for tools patches that I am explicitly
> requested to do by a toolstack maintainer. A comment in a changeset comment
> is fine if it is a reminder for Ian, but it is useless in terms of getting
> me to apply it to 4.1-testing (for example).

Indeed.  It is a reminder for me.


Xen-devel mailing list