This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Home Products Support Community News


Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] libxc: use correct macro when unmapping memory a

To: Jim Fehlig <jfehlig@xxxxxxxxxx>, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] libxc: use correct macro when unmapping memory after save operation
From: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 16:52:03 +0100
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Tue, 24 May 2011 09:01:47 -0700
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:sender:user-agent:date:subject:from:to:cc :message-id:thread-topic:thread-index:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=q3qvOYkkqL5TPWf+Hc79nh/GX004oU7zhB3xpUJr7cg=; b=by2qc75HnO11w7asgeNJfAHqNo4jlao+g8Pyi2NMjcKhrwiiBswC+GIlS+tZHr+oLv y2/rrJe/9qg77ruBDV5RxdnldfRNuTv2RBG5NsFkI2QIYFIjWocGsR/m7MNzXUO85moP g/EYkU/xlmWDpTyiD4GD22qeUvuVxEh7FrL/E=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:user-agent:date:subject:from:to:cc:message-id:thread-topic :thread-index:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=xL3QQDXivc/6pGcNS37CQTEu3Z/ru6jzLXyNW0B9m7d98pkluGOIo8RpCM3btIksd/ uG5dWXSaKUktRawm4t0Y4mMGEeegKgfq/fcrb0gERB4CW3uvTUHI16UsmgtGQgvZVR2j ximGLq5ELWAR2yUpesNB3T4Y6YVvoJir22JIk=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4DDBBFF1.4050905@xxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcwaKoY9PpOmPUjDT0ycwMwK7h0/Cg==
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] libxc: use correct macro when unmapping memory after save operation
User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/
On 24/05/2011 15:25, "Jim Fehlig" <jfehlig@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> BTW, thanks for the commit message note about "backporting to relevant
> earlier trees".  I was going to ask that this be applied to
> 4.1-testing.  Should such a statement be included for fixes that apply
> to multiple trees?  Is it helpful for scanning potential backports in
> -unstable?

Worth pointing out that at the moment only I seem to be backporting to the
stable trees, and I only do that for tools patches that I am explicitly
requested to do by a toolstack maintainer. A comment in a changeset comment
is fine if it is a reminder for Ian, but it is useless in terms of getting
me to apply it to 4.1-testing (for example).

 -- Keir

Xen-devel mailing list