WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [GIT PULL] for-2.6.32/bug-fixes

> >> That wouldn't tell you anything if they're all empty, as there's nothing
> >> preventing other guests (including other guest OSes) to still send
> >> non-empty ones - after all the protocol allows for this.
> > 
> > Aha! That is what you been trying to tell me. I will make a patch to make
> > sure to not overwrite the req->sector_number blindly. What other guest OSes
> 
> Or use the patch I proposed?

Yes. Much superior to mine.
> 
> > use barriers? I looked at Solaris (it uses 'feature-flush-cache'), NetBSD
> > ('feature-flush-cache') and Linux ('feature-barrier' and now in 2.6.40
> > 'feature-flush-cache').
> > 
> > The GPLV Windows drivers have no barrier implementation - do you know if
> > the Novell ones are using barriers?
> 
> No, I don't.

Any idea who might know?

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel