xen-devel
RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86, cpuidle: remove assertion on X86_FEATURE_TS
> From: Keir Fraser [mailto:keir.xen@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Friday, May 13, 2011 5:15 PM
> >>
> >> As it is, I'm still of the opinion that the smallest correct fix
> >> would be to invert the assertion predicate.
> >>
> >
> > For now, I suggest to remove the assertion before the whole logic is
> > cleaned up.
> > it's not wise to break a working system by adding assertion on a
> > to-be-discussed assumption. :-)
>
> I'll move the fixed assertion into write_tsc() in xen-unstable, and remove
> entirely from the stable branches.
>
Thanks for helping that.
Kevin
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86, cpuidle: remove assertion on X86_FEATURE_TSC_RELIABLE, Tian, Kevin
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86, cpuidle: remove assertion on X86_FEATURE_TSC_RELIABLE, Keir Fraser
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86, cpuidle: remove assertion on X86_FEATURE_TSC_RELIABLE, Tian, Kevin
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86, cpuidle: remove assertion on X86_FEATURE_TSC_RELIABLE, Jan Beulich
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86, cpuidle: remove assertion on X86_FEATURE_TSC_RELIABLE, Keir Fraser
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86, cpuidle: remove assertion on X86_FEATURE_TSC_RELIABLE, Tian, Kevin
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86, cpuidle: remove assertion on X86_FEATURE_TSC_RELIABLE, Keir Fraser
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86, cpuidle: remove assertion on X86_FEATURE_TSC_RELIABLE,
Tian, Kevin <=
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86, cpuidle: remove assertion on X86_FEATURE_TSC_RELIABLE, Jan Beulich
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86, cpuidle: remove assertion on X86_FEATURE_TSC_RELIABLE, Dan Magenheimer
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86, cpuidle: remove assertion on X86_FEATURE_TSC_RELIABLE, Tian, Kevin
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86, cpuidle: remove assertion on X86_FEATURE_TSC_RELIABLE, Keir Fraser
|
|
|