xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86, cpuidle: remove assertion on X86_FEATURE_TS
On 13/05/2011 03:45, "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> x86, cpuidle: remove assertion on X86_FEATURE_TSC_RELIABLE
>
> 23228:1329d99b4f16 disables deep cstate to avoid restoring tsc when
> tsc msr is not writtable on some old platform, which however also
> adds an assertion on X86_FEATURE_TSC_RELIABLE in cstate_restore_tsc.
> The two don't match as tsc writtable-ness has nothing to do with
> whether it's reliable. As long as Xen can use tsc as the time source
> and it's writable, it should be OK to continue using deep cstate
> with tsc save/restore.
Looks like I just got the assertion the wrong way round, should be
ASSERT(!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_TSC_RELIABLE)).
> Also mark tsc as reliable for X86_FEATURE_CONSTANT_TSC.
Unrelated change? Also, TSC_RELIABLE should only be asserted on NONSTOP_TSC
platforms. I suspect this change is not correct.
-- Keir
> Without this fix, one of our platform hits the assertion which
> only has constant tsc feature.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> diff -r 0c446850d85e xen/arch/x86/cpu/intel.c
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/cpu/intel.c Wed May 11 12:58:04 2011 +0100
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/cpu/intel.c Fri May 13 10:01:20 2011 +0800
> @@ -221,8 +221,10 @@
> if (c->x86 == 6)
> set_bit(X86_FEATURE_P3, c->x86_capability);
> if ((c->x86 == 0xf && c->x86_model >= 0x03) ||
> - (c->x86 == 0x6 && c->x86_model >= 0x0e))
> + (c->x86 == 0x6 && c->x86_model >= 0x0e)) {
> set_bit(X86_FEATURE_CONSTANT_TSC, c->x86_capability);
> + set_bit(X86_FEATURE_TSC_RELIABLE, c->x86_capability);
> + }
> if (cpuid_edx(0x80000007) & (1u<<8)) {
> set_bit(X86_FEATURE_CONSTANT_TSC, c->x86_capability);
> set_bit(X86_FEATURE_NONSTOP_TSC, c->x86_capability);
> diff -r 0c446850d85e xen/arch/x86/time.c
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/time.c Wed May 11 12:58:04 2011 +0100
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/time.c Fri May 13 10:01:20 2011 +0800
> @@ -686,8 +686,6 @@
> if ( boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_NONSTOP_TSC) )
> return;
>
> - ASSERT(boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_TSC_RELIABLE));
> -
> write_tsc(stime2tsc(read_platform_stime()));
> }
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86, cpuidle: remove assertion on X86_FEATURE_TSC_RELIABLE, Tian, Kevin
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86, cpuidle: remove assertion on X86_FEATURE_TSC_RELIABLE,
Keir Fraser <=
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86, cpuidle: remove assertion on X86_FEATURE_TSC_RELIABLE, Tian, Kevin
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86, cpuidle: remove assertion on X86_FEATURE_TSC_RELIABLE, Jan Beulich
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86, cpuidle: remove assertion on X86_FEATURE_TSC_RELIABLE, Keir Fraser
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86, cpuidle: remove assertion on X86_FEATURE_TSC_RELIABLE, Tian, Kevin
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86, cpuidle: remove assertion on X86_FEATURE_TSC_RELIABLE, Keir Fraser
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86, cpuidle: remove assertion on X86_FEATURE_TSC_RELIABLE, Tian, Kevin
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86, cpuidle: remove assertion on X86_FEATURE_TSC_RELIABLE, Jan Beulich
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86, cpuidle: remove assertion on X86_FEATURE_TSC_RELIABLE, Dan Magenheimer
|
Previous by Date: |
[Xen-devel] [xen-4.0-testing test] 7063: trouble: blocked/broken/pass, xen . org |
Next by Date: |
RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86, cpuidle: remove assertion on X86_FEATURE_TSC_RELIABLE, Tian, Kevin |
Previous by Thread: |
[Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86, cpuidle: remove assertion on X86_FEATURE_TSC_RELIABLE, Tian, Kevin |
Next by Thread: |
RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86, cpuidle: remove assertion on X86_FEATURE_TSC_RELIABLE, Tian, Kevin |
Indexes: |
[Date]
[Thread]
[Top]
[All Lists] |
|
|