On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 9:24 AM, Ian Campbell
<Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-03-16 at 16:21 +0000, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 04:08:14PM +0000, Ian Campbell wrote:
>> > On Wed, 2011-03-16 at 15:58 +0000, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>> > > > > 2/5 depends on Rafael tree so will have to wait until that gets
>> > > > > merged in.
>> > > > > But we can definitly push those two (1/5 and 2/5) right when
>> > > > > Rafael's tree
>> > > > > has been merged.
>> > > >
>> > > > Does it? Why?
>> > > >
>> > > > If it's just the minor conflict in arch/x86/xen/Kconfig I say throw it
>> > > > in and let it get resolved at merge time.
>> > >
>> > > I get this rejection:
>> > [...]
>> >
>> > Did you take 1/5? 2/5 needs it.
>>
>> Yes. I created a new branch based off linus/master, and did git am -s <
>> ~/save
>>
>> cat ~/save | grep Message
>> Message-Id: <1299906435-30927-1-git-send-email-rshriram@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Message-Id: <1299906420-30885-1-git-send-email-rshriram@xxxxxxxxx>
>> konrad@phenom:~/work/linux$ cat ~/save | grep Subject:
>> Subject: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 2/5] xen: use freeze/restore/thaw PM events
>> Subject: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 1/5] xen: xenbus PM events support
>
> Those subjects look backwards?
>
>>
>> >
>> > Ian.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Xen-devel mailing list
>> > Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>
>
>
Some thing is amiss. Anyway, I rebased my patches to linus's tree
(master) and it
still applies cleanly AFAICT. Konrad is pulling it now.
I will also resend the "v4 2/5", cc-ing Rafael, just so that he knows.
shriram
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Home