|   | 
      | 
  
  
      | 
      | 
  
 
     | 
    | 
  
  
     | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
      | 
  
  
    | 
         
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [SPAM] Re: kernel BUG at arch/x86/xen/mmu.c:1860! -	idea
 
 
 On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 11:52 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk  <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: 
> ====================================================== 
> Kernel 2.6.32.28 without XEN: 
> about 50 successful runs of Teck Choon Giams "test.sh" script. 
> (modified for handling 10 test volumes and sleeping 2 seconds) 
> multipathd restarted succesfully s 
> multipath module loaded/unloaded successfully 
> lvm2 restarted successfully 
.. snip.. 
> ====================================================== 
> Kernel 2.6.32.28 with XEN 4.0.1: 
> at about loop 2 for volume 7 of "test.sh" it stopped doing ... well anything 
> there has been no output on the screen and neitehr syslog nor dmesg entry. 
> I left it hanging for about 15 Minutes until i decided to write this 
> one off as a side effect of the same underlying problem. 
> All lvm2 tools stopped working and i couldnt shut it down. 
> Killing the hangig process ended it properly. 
 
Jeremy and I were brainstorming this yesterday and couple of things 
that we thought might be interesting are to: 
 
 - turn on CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC 
 - turn on CONFIG_DEBUG_LIST 
 - turn on CONFIG_DEBUG_KMEMLEAK 
 - turn on CONFIG_JBD_DEBUG, CONFIG_JBD2_DEBUG 
 - turn on CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON 
 
And see if anything starts coming out.
   Thanks a lot for both of you spending time to do so.  It isn't easy as I believe this is something related to kernel 2.6.32.x and just wondering is there something related to *sched_domains?  I read recent mails in LKML about rebuild_sched_domains consider dangerous issues... and that is about recent kernels but won't know what recent kernels that refer to... ... 
 I will do those config changes in one of my test server when time permit and will post results/output here when done.  
 
 
Also looking in the changes for the drivers/dm/ between 2.6.32 and 2.6.38 and 
see if we just hitting some memory leak bugs that hadn't been back-ported. 
 
(Still busy with the upstream effort, can't work on this). 
  You mean 2.6.39 merge window?
  Once again, thanks.
  Kindest regards, Giam Teck Choon 
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
 
 |   
 
| <Prev in Thread] | 
Current Thread | 
[Next in Thread>
 |  
- Re: [Xen-devel] [SPAM]  Re: kernel BUG at arch/x86/xen/mmu.c:1860!, (continued)
 
- Re: [Xen-devel] [SPAM]  Re: kernel BUG at arch/x86/xen/mmu.c:1860!	- ideas., Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
 - Re: [Xen-devel] [SPAM] Re: kernel BUG at arch/x86/xen/mmu.c:1860! -	ideas.,
Teck Choon Giam <=
 - Re: [Xen-devel] [SPAM] Re: kernel BUG at arch/x86/xen/mmu.c:1860!	- ideas., Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
 - Re: [Xen-devel] [SPAM] Re: kernel BUG at arch/x86/xen/mmu.c:1860!	- ideas., Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
 - Re: [Xen-devel] [SPAM] Re: kernel BUG at arch/x86/xen/mmu.c:1860! -	ideas., Teck Choon Giam
 
- Re: [Xen-devel] [SPAM] Re: kernel BUG at arch/x86/xen/mmu.c:1860! -	ideas., Teck Choon Giam
 - Re: [Xen-devel] [SPAM] Re: kernel BUG at arch/x86/xen/mmu.c:1860! -	ideas., Teck Choon Giam
 
- Message not available
 - Re: [Xen-devel] [SPAM] Re: kernel BUG at arch/x86/xen/mmu.c:1860! -	ideas., Teck Choon Giam
 
- Re: [Xen-devel] kernel BUG at arch/x86/xen/mmu.c:1860!, Andreas Olsowski
 - Re: [Xen-devel] kernel BUG at arch/x86/xen/mmu.c:1860!, benco
 - Re: [Xen-devel] kernel BUG at arch/x86/xen/mmu.c:1860!, Sander Eikelenboom
 - Re: [Xen-devel] kernel BUG at arch/x86/xen/mmu.c:1860!, Teck Choon Giam
 
 
 |  
  
 | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
    |