WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 12/14] xen: events: remove use of nr_irqs as uppe

To: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 12/14] xen: events: remove use of nr_irqs as upper bound on number of pirqs
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 00:33:05 -0500
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Wed, 09 Mar 2011 21:35:01 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1299692486-28634-12-git-send-email-ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <1299692459.17339.700.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1299692486-28634-12-git-send-email-ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
>  int xen_irq_from_pirq(unsigned pirq)
>  {
> -     return pirq_to_irq[pirq];
> +     int irq;
> +
> +     struct irq_info *info;
> +
> +     spin_lock(&irq_mapping_update_lock);
> +
> +     list_for_each_entry(info, &xen_irq_list_head, list) {
> +             if (info == NULL || info->type != IRQT_PIRQ)
> +                     continue;
> +             irq = info->irq;
> +             if (info->u.pirq.pirq == pirq)
> +                     goto out;
> +     }
> +     irq = -1;
> +out:
> +     spin_lock(&irq_mapping_update_lock);
> +
> +     return -1;

Shouldn't this be:

  return irq

?

How come you are using the spin_lock here, but not
in other places when iterating over the xen_irq_list_head?

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>