| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] Make explicit message when guest failed to suspe
Frank Pan writes ("Re: [PATCH] Make explicit message when guest failed to
suspend"):
> I've never used xl before. All commands I use start with xm.
> Is xl a substitute of xm? Also, is xm deprecated?
xl is preferred nowadays. xm is still supported in Xen 4.1 (current
xen-unstable) but will probably be removed some point in the 4.2
release cycle.
xl is supposed to be a mostly drop-in replacement for xm; you may need
to adjust your startup scripts to use it.
Ian.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home