| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/3] xen: Use PM/Hibernate events for save/re
|
To: |
Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/3] xen: Use PM/Hibernate events for save/restore/chkpt |
|
From: |
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx> |
|
Date: |
Fri, 25 Feb 2011 19:24:47 +0100 |
|
Cc: |
"xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>, Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx>, Shriram Rajagopalan <rshriram@xxxxxxxxx>, "linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
Delivery-date: |
Fri, 25 Feb 2011 10:25:18 -0800 |
|
Envelope-to: |
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|
In-reply-to: |
<alpine.DEB.2.00.1102251713560.19277@kaball-desktop> |
|
List-help: |
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
|
List-id: |
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
|
List-post: |
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
|
List-subscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
|
List-unsubscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
|
References: |
<1298157158-5421-1-git-send-email-rshriram@xxxxxxxxx> <201102241941.00984.rjw@xxxxxxx> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1102251713560.19277@kaball-desktop> |
|
Sender: |
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|
User-agent: |
KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.38-rc6+; KDE/4.4.4; x86_64; ; ) |
On Friday, February 25, 2011, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Feb 2011, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > I believe it only "[PATCH 3/3] PM: pm.h - Add comments about Xen
> > > save/restore/chkpt use case"
> > >
> > > (http://marc.info/?i=1298157158-5421-4-git-send-email-rshriram@xxxxxxxxx)
> >
> > This particular one should go in _after_ the functional patches.
> >
> > > I or Stefano (these patches are against Ian's tree which is againsts
> > > Stefano's
> > > tree) can take the other patches and stick Pavel's Ack, Rafeal's Ack,
> > > Ian's Ack
> > > on them and also my Signed-off for the Xen bits.
> > >
> > > I think that would work?
> >
> > In fact, I think it's better if all patches go through the Xen tree.
> >
>
> I don't mind taking them but if they have to go after your
> suspend-2.6/linux-next tree this would introduce a new dependency in the
> branch I am preparing for linux-next myself.
>
> Should I pull your suspend-2.6/linux-next tree into my linux-next branch?
> Considering that this could create conflicts in linux-next if you
> force-push your tree with some new changes and I don't update my version
> of it, maybe it is better if I pull only a reduced version of it with
> just the strict dependencies?
It's not that simple, I think you'd need to pull my entire linux-next branch
because of the dependencies between commits in there.
Alternatively, I can take the entire $subject patchset.
Still, I'd like the discussion to settle before anyway.
Thanks,
Rafael
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home