| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/3] xen: Use PM/Hibernate events for save/re
|
To: |
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx> |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/3] xen: Use PM/Hibernate events for save/restore/chkpt |
|
From: |
Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
Date: |
Fri, 25 Feb 2011 17:19:50 +0000 |
|
Cc: |
Ian, Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>, Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx>, Shriram Rajagopalan <rshriram@xxxxxxxxx>, "linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
Delivery-date: |
Fri, 25 Feb 2011 09:19:55 -0800 |
|
Envelope-to: |
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|
In-reply-to: |
<201102241941.00984.rjw@xxxxxxx> |
|
List-help: |
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
|
List-id: |
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
|
List-post: |
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
|
List-subscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
|
List-unsubscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
|
References: |
<1298157158-5421-1-git-send-email-rshriram@xxxxxxxxx> <201102232110.22059.rjw@xxxxxxx> <20110224161324.GD6893@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <201102241941.00984.rjw@xxxxxxx> |
|
Sender: |
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|
User-agent: |
Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23) |
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > I believe it only "[PATCH 3/3] PM: pm.h - Add comments about Xen
> > save/restore/chkpt use case"
> >
> > (http://marc.info/?i=1298157158-5421-4-git-send-email-rshriram@xxxxxxxxx)
>
> This particular one should go in _after_ the functional patches.
>
> > I or Stefano (these patches are against Ian's tree which is againsts
> > Stefano's
> > tree) can take the other patches and stick Pavel's Ack, Rafeal's Ack, Ian's
> > Ack
> > on them and also my Signed-off for the Xen bits.
> >
> > I think that would work?
>
> In fact, I think it's better if all patches go through the Xen tree.
>
I don't mind taking them but if they have to go after your
suspend-2.6/linux-next tree this would introduce a new dependency in the
branch I am preparing for linux-next myself.
Should I pull your suspend-2.6/linux-next tree into my linux-next branch?
Considering that this could create conflicts in linux-next if you
force-push your tree with some new changes and I don't update my version
of it, maybe it is better if I pull only a reduced version of it with
just the strict dependencies?
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home