WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/3] xen: use freeze/restore/thaw PM events for s

To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/3] xen: use freeze/restore/thaw PM events for suspend/resume/chkpt
From: Shriram Rajagopalan <rshriram@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 14:09:05 -0800
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>, linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Iam Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>, Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 14:11:00 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20110222204320.GB4605@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <1298157158-5421-1-git-send-email-rshriram@xxxxxxxxx> <1298157158-5421-3-git-send-email-rshriram@xxxxxxxxx> <20110222204320.GB4605@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: rshriram@xxxxxxxxx
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
<konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 03:12:37PM -0800, Shriram Rajagopalan wrote:
>> Use PM_FREEZE, PM_THAW and PM_RESTORE power events for
>> suspend/resume/checkpoint functionality, instead of PM_SUSPEND
>> and PM_RESUME. Use of these pm events fixes the Xen Guest hangup
>> when taking checkpoints. When a suspend event is cancelled
>> (while taking checkpoints once/continuously), we use PM_THAW
>> instead of PM_RESUME. PM_RESTORE is used when suspend is not
>> cancelled. See Documentation/power/devices.txt and linux/pm.h
>> for more info about freeze, thaw and restore. The sequence of
>> pm events in a suspend-resume scenario is shown below.
>>
>>         dpm_suspend_start(PMSG_FREEZE);
>>
>>                 dpm_suspend_noirq(PMSG_FREEZE);
>>
>>                        sysdev_suspend(PMSG_FREEZE);
>>                        cancelled = suspend_hypercall()
>>                        sysdev_resume();
>>
>>                dpm_resume_noirq(cancelled ? PMSG_THAW : PMSG_RESTORE);
>>
>>        dpm_resume_end(cancelled ? PMSG_THAW : PMSG_RESTORE);
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Shriram Rajagopalan <rshriram@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  drivers/base/power/main.c                  |    8 ++++----
>>  drivers/xen/manage.c                       |   16 ++++++++--------
>>  drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_probe_frontend.c |    8 +++++---
>>  3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/base/power/main.c b/drivers/base/power/main.c
>> index 8340497..aab4f60 100644
>> --- a/drivers/base/power/main.c
>> +++ b/drivers/base/power/main.c
>> @@ -233,7 +233,7 @@ static int pm_op(struct device *dev,
>>               }
>>               break;
>>  #endif /* CONFIG_SUSPEND */
>> -#ifdef CONFIG_HIBERNATION
>> +#if defined(CONFIG_HIBERNATION) || defined(CONFIG_XEN_SAVE_RESTORE)
>
> Could we just make CONFIG_XEN_SAVE_RESTORE depend on CONFIG_HIBERANTION?
> Like this:
>
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/Kconfig b/arch/x86/xen/Kconfig
> index 5b54892..838e20c 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/xen/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/x86/xen/Kconfig
> @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ config XEN_MAX_DOMAIN_MEMORY
>
>  config XEN_SAVE_RESTORE
>        bool
> -       depends on XEN && PM
> +       depends on XEN && PM && HIBERNATION
>        default y
>
>  config XEN_DEBUG_FS
>
>
On that aspect, just noticed
config PM_SLEEP
        bool
        depends on SUSPEND || HIBERNATION || XEN_SAVE_RESTORE
        default y
we could get rid of XEN_SAVE_RESTORE as the suspend/resume code doesnt
depend on PM_SLEEP
anymore.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>