WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] tap vs tap2 (libxl & xend)

To: Shriram Rajagopalan <rshriram@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] tap vs tap2 (libxl & xend)
From: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 16:53:56 +0000
Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 08:54:44 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1DCA9893-882C-4047-AFD0-6289F939BB81@xxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <1DCA9893-882C-4047-AFD0-6289F939BB81@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23)
On Wed, 16 Feb 2011, Shriram Rajagopalan wrote:
> Is there a reason behind libxl not accepting tap2:.. disk format, while xend 
> seems to? I know the latter is being phased out slowly, but IIRC, with 4.0.1, 
> we moved to tap2 addressing explicitly.
> 

Apart from the fact the the tap2 syntax doesn't make any sense, xl
should provide VM config compatibility so it should support the tap2:
syntax. Kamala sent a patch for that yesterday.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>