 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] tap vs tap2 (libxl & xend)
| To: | "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [Xen-devel] tap vs tap2 (libxl & xend) |
| From: | Shriram Rajagopalan <rshriram@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 16 Feb 2011 08:43:37 -0800 |
| Delivery-date: | Wed, 16 Feb 2011 08:44:36 -0800 |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
Is there a reason behind libxl not accepting tap2:.. disk format, while xend seems to? I know the latter is being phased out slowly, but IIRC, with 4.0.1, we moved to tap2 addressing explicitly. Shriram _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Xen-devel] Re: Xen and incorporating event channels in to nr_irqs, Ian Campbell |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] tap vs tap2 (libxl & xend), Stefano Stabellini |
| Previous by Thread: | [Xen-devel] Xen and incorporating event channels in to nr_irqs, Ian Campbell |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] tap vs tap2 (libxl & xend), Stefano Stabellini |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
