WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] xen-unstable on OL6 (RHEL6 clone) problems

To: Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] xen-unstable on OL6 (RHEL6 clone) problems
From: Todd Deshane <todd.deshane@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 17:50:12 +0000
Cc: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, John Haxby <john.haxby@xxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Fajar A. Nugraha" <list@xxxxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 09:51:29 -0800
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=FwGWkZzMQqCvIl4E6NhhfQyTNXEJ9GAw2uwaCvrbkcI=; b=yABdCEAIiQSECLoh/5jveR70ilY84zZxL9OFVD8cIWpi/V70CoJnZM4G1fC6Ws7nIC MvPIZKKwavNNqkYdW33JjkryZaYzp85CXpLFPkJ2dXMAjonXAMiqezpdJPHtUD4+GXCg pb1xNbDM1oFJwuL2kQtihgA5mPqXScwEfRjtQ=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=u8fuYjxHpP8iITU83+cYG/+O8vmADuyYYhwWZfrHaTe0+KAhiLArJaeaeEXOxEJcx3 4TjMnT3ZOEfadAmzswa25xFAGpAtLW3BKoEz8k0L6mPQ8KjjvyHJjekn6DuU9lv629Ua oAqXDHWzHRjgaEb1JhczS1bNEaZG0z3rGthV4=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <9b25bffc-e4dd-4124-8485-6053cc7da15c@default>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <f16717d5-28ae-4c2f-bb80-f0cae1c4b4e1@default> <a00a492b-24c6-486f-a602-2d33142fc20e@default> <AANLkTik+wjewTzKKNS6EOP0T3xfqGxaS7rSyh38c3ZXB@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <AANLkTikR-2b=YQZE2nMuwtP1Fr2m6qp_gKN_KKebQ8cu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <f47a8e87-3891-4190-9129-565fedaaa6ff@default> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1102101753500.2921@kaball-desktop> <AANLkTimE_qZtnZS3DJRr0eTXpk1sVPteonoz2oQuS=e2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1297410584.3221.1436.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1102111143210.2826@kaball-desktop> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1102111207580.2826@kaball-desktop> <9b25bffc-e4dd-4124-8485-6053cc7da15c@default>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 5:30 PM, Dan Magenheimer
<dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > The only thing worse for users than making a change like this and
>> > failing to adequately document it would be to make a change and then
>> > document it with a set of inconsistent and incompatible
>> recommendations.
>
> Well, there IS one thing worse, and that's documenting the
> new way WRONG.  And that's what the current draft is.
> The examples inconsistently use "br0" and "xenbr0".
> All need to be one or the other.  While that may be obvious
> to all of you networking alpha-geeks (humor intended), it
> was not obvious to me... I assumed there was some Xen
> magic that turned one into the other!
>
> Further, I *think* xenbr0 is required, not br0.  Not sure,
> but it worked for me as soon as I switched everything to
> xenbr0.  If this is true, the libvirt wiki that Todd pointed
> to is wrong for Xen also.
>
> Finally, since John's post dropped the cc list and I'm not
> sure everyone reads every xen-devel message, I'm repeating
> that John found that my problem that started all this, namely
> seeing this message many times:
>
> /sys/class/net/br0/bridge: No such file or directory
>
> is due to an old bridge package shipped with RHEL6 (and
> clones such as OL6).  John's post is here and I can confirm
> that I updated to the newer RPM and the messages went away.
>
> http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2011-02/msg00725.html
>
> Thanks,
> Dan
>
> P.S. Thanks very much to everyone for contributions to the
> migration wiki... I'm not trying to be critical at all, just
> trying to provide corrections and debug one of the sources of
> my frustration that led to my on-list tirade.
>

Thanks for pointing things out Dan. I think it is smarter to go with
xenbr0 consistently since that is what RHEL5 had.

I think I have now fixed the items that you pointed out.

Let us know if you find anything else.

Thanks,
Todd

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>