WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] xen-unstable on OL6 (RHEL6 clone) problems

To: Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] xen-unstable on OL6 (RHEL6 clone) problems
From: Todd Deshane <todd.deshane@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 22:18:38 -0500
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, keir@xxxxxxx, "Fajar A. Nugraha" <list@xxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Wed, 09 Feb 2011 19:19:52 -0800
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=OhHMZlFgEZzUiVHRKyR9y2jW4pDmPOUrbaLwfuqYBVM=; b=glG3mHM0Hrtvx+1fDvkpBAeh9Wtb7DTcSdzVD1+DYgdGVc2Kwjr9YDwKpPGQxtnYkq jgy3zbpteZZn7ExKkOu1APLUjFMfHEZyRoSqVB2eSPaYKgjs92w7vq30poTrQQBEF2st uk5CITk6n+DBAXKiWN2J3/In2rQxRe1pT5pwI=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; b=BZRsgsEnD0m/I/KD2LNLfQetD0JQ7kTlXLzor3dJxB0lL+l41XwaJAPE1A2l8fg3SZ Tm+WWE16JUbSr4Bt7ONGa+T1kQjRAu8VYpmDM+ftC1lib7zBZqyHo6ieCo3/SKB4nOwl JYMdf6+JQ0ZJwe2c/820cTVeD6XfyPHO1B598=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <eb76e277-a5ea-40e2-a27f-07f940835254@default>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <f16717d5-28ae-4c2f-bb80-f0cae1c4b4e1@default> <a00a492b-24c6-486f-a602-2d33142fc20e@default> <AANLkTik+wjewTzKKNS6EOP0T3xfqGxaS7rSyh38c3ZXB@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <AANLkTikR-2b=YQZE2nMuwtP1Fr2m6qp_gKN_KKebQ8cu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <eb76e277-a5ea-40e2-a27f-07f940835254@default>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 9:38 PM, Dan Magenheimer
<dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> From: Todd Deshane [mailto:deshantm@xxxxxxxxx]
>> Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2011 7:15 PM
>> To: Fajar A. Nugraha
>> Cc: Dan Magenheimer; xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; keir@xxxxxxx
>> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] xen-unstable on OL6 (RHEL6 clone) problems
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 8:54 PM, Fajar A. Nugraha <list@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 8:38 AM, Todd Deshane <deshantm@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> There is almost full compatibility, with the exception of being able
>> >> to have arbitrary python code embedded. Most should work directly.
>> >> Name the bridge the same as before and it is likely to completely
>> work
>> >> with most built to work with Xen 4.0
>> >>
>> >> I'll be sure to clarify that a bit on the wiki page.
>> >
>> > Reading the wiki, isn't the change only required when using xl?
>> > Shouldn't xm and xend work just as it has always been?
>>
>> xm and xend are still available (for now), but using xl and libxl is
>> preferred.
>
> But the answer to Fajar's question is NO, correct?

I believe the answer to his question should have been yes (xend/xm are
still there and should work as before (for now)). You may have just
come across a bug that was tested. xm is not automatically tested by
the automated testing system (example here:
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/5680/)

> bridging stuff is irrelevant to xm vs xl and must be done
> even if you are using xm/xend on 4.1, correct?
>

The old xen bridge code is currently still in the tree, but it is not
the preferred use.

> BTW, I ran into this because "xl vncviewer" wasn't working
> for me so I had to use "xm vncviewer" (which worked).
>

I believe there was a patch for this recently
see:
http://xen.markmail.org/search/?q=xl+vncviewer#query:xl%20vncviewer+page:1+mid:nxhvjkalvjn2iolk+state:results

Hope that helps.

Thanks,
Todd

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel