Re: [Xen-devel] vscsi 2TB patches

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 04.01.11 at 14:23, Samuel Kvasnica <bugreports@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 01/04/2011 02:07 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> I wasn't actually after the printk(), but rather noticing your original
>> scsifront patch apparently consisted of only an added comment;
>> that I was wrong with actually (not being used to read non-unified
>> diffs), but your newer patch still contains a number of apparently
>> arbitrary newline insertions and removals.
> 
> is this ok now ?

I was about to ack this (given the lack of a response from the
original authors, and after looking over it again), when I noticed
an apparent inconsistency: {READ,WRITE}_{6,10,16} are all
un-commented now in scsiback_emulation_init(), but
{READ,WRITE}_12 remain commented. Why is that?

Thanks, Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel