This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Home Products Support Community News


Re: [Xen-devel] 2.6.37 dom0 non-fatal BUG: sleeping function called from

To: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] 2.6.37 dom0 non-fatal BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/mutex.c:85
From: Gerry Reno <greno@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2011 13:12:26 -0500
Delivery-date: Thu, 06 Jan 2011 10:13:17 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20110106180019.GM2754@xxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <900599.56710.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4D2600D8.9020903@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20110106180019.GM2754@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv: Gecko/20100423 Thunderbird/3.0.4
On 01/06/2011 01:00 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 12:50:16PM -0500, Gerry Reno wrote:
>> On 01/06/2011 12:42 PM, Boris Derzhavets wrote:
>>> In response to Michael Young post fedora-xen list :-
>>>> There is a 2.6.37 kernel to test (2.6.37-1.xendom0.fc15)
>>> Works for me under Xen 4.0.1 , but attempt to "startx" causes stack trace.
>>> Works as vanilla as well . Allows to run KVMs been built with standard
>>> fedora kernel.
>>> Boris.
>> Haven't tried 2.6.37 yet but I have not been able to get X running with
>> any of the dom0 kernels while using Ubuntu Lucid.  I've always gotten a
>> stack trace.
> Which kernels did you try?
> Can you post the stack trace? 
> -- Pasi

I'm using this machine currently so I can't reboot it to get a stack
trace.  Too much work open.  It's probably the same stack trace that
Boris got.
I tested using some 2.6.31 and 2.6.32 kernels.


Xen-devel mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>