 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] qemu VS tapdisk2 VS blkback benchmarks
| To: | Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Xen-devel] qemu VS tapdisk2 VS blkback benchmarks |
| From: | Shriram Rajagopalan <rshriram@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 11 Dec 2010 12:16:38 -0800 |
| Cc: | "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Daniel Stodden <Daniel.Stodden@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivery-date: | Sat, 11 Dec 2010 12:17:30 -0800 |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=kO3YVBei0ZyEuXsIUITtZ29paqSWCWWdpYvf6Pnp01Q=; b=eQnzQ9VZXmtGETNiaTLz8+vgRfZAXRx9kNvjzQ1wvmbG8LJd/Wa7QeBe36HUOEheUn Ie4H4CXqfj/+ZglDaSr8rLjiADka/FKU7XrXf+PpgbS74yuE0Q4RPhfRAwhGq+0yqQ20 KAfK5biDoaPOJY7B/mPIu4HPuDdP3WmjHy4DY= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=RqgkzdBcj3Fu3HprQk+ND8OYA7n4DjmRdA+xKDa+Tgpadf22B4kxT76tldMJ37TSuw /4J3LN3LwXi1WPdHkWUQFKxPMI3zvYmCsFFK56eLmfLAl+xTbzDIqLPDA9IXhKucPap7 E1LzAQdFRW1g7gNjVObgb3IZMq7NDaX1HjBQQ= |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <alpine.DEB.2.00.1012101842180.2390@kaball-desktop> |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| References: | <alpine.DEB.2.00.1012101556250.2390@kaball-desktop> <1292005965.30829.0.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1012101842180.2390@kaball-desktop> |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
I am assuming when you said "blkback over lvm", you used "phy:/dev/..." format. do you have any figures on tapdisk2 over lvm? [wherein you would use "tap2:aio:/dev/..." ] shriram -- perception is but an offspring of its own self _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 3056: regressions - FAIL, xen . org |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Xen-devel] I have reverted to Xen 3.5-unstable for VGA Passthrough, "Singapore Citizen Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) 张恩鸣 " |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] qemu VS tapdisk2 VS blkback benchmarks, Stefano Stabellini |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] qemu VS tapdisk2 VS blkback benchmarks, Stefano Stabellini |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
